Top Law Schools

the lsat can not put random sentences together and then expect it to represent any sort of real life situation or evaluate one's reasoning since in these cases the entire stimulus is nonsensical. i dont care what psychometric bs they use, this test is like old-fashioned bloodletting to cure a disease.

that, my friends, is MYSTICISM.

Coming unhinged FTW.

testmachine45 wrote:the lsat can not put random sentences together and then expect it to represent any sort of real life situation or one's reasoning. i dont care what psychometric bs they use, this test is like old-fashioned bloodletting to cure a disease.

that, my friends, is MYSTICISM.

Example, please?

testmachine45 wrote:the lsat can not put random sentences together and then expect it to represent any sort of real life situation or evaluate one's reasoning since in these cases the entire stimulus is nonsensical. i dont care what psychometric bs they use, this test is like old-fashioned bloodletting to cure a disease.

that, my friends, is MYSTICISM.

Logic Reasoning -> Flaw -> False Analogy?

pt 60 lr2 #10

Consistent with the hypothesis, the data showed that the LSAT was a relatively robust predictor of in-class exams and a relatively weak predictor on take-home exams and papers. In contrast, undergraduate GPA was a relatively stable predictor on all three testing methods. The major implication of this study is that the current emphasis on time-pressured law school exams may significantly increase the relative importance of the LSAT as an admission criterion. As a result, significantly fewer minority students can be admitted through the regular admissions process. Moreover, the findings of this study suggest that when speed is used as a variable on law school exams, the type of testing method, independent of knowledge and preparation, can change the ordering (i.e., relative grades) of individual test-takers. Finally, this study found some preliminary evidence that the performance gap between white and minority students may be significantly smaller on less time-pressured testing methods, including blindgraded take-home exams. Definitive evidence on this issue will require a larger sample size.

testmachine45 wrote:pt 60 lr2 #10

I got this one wrong but I felt stupid during review for the mistake (which could be said with 99% of my mistakes in LR)

You've encountered one question out of thousands that you don't understand, and now the LSAT is an ineffective predictor of one's ability to reason? What does that say about your ability to reason?

I hate take-home exams and always do worse on them than timed exams.

I hope that means I'm supposed to ace the LSAT in five days.

niederbomb wrote:I hate take-home exams and always do worse on them than timed exams.

I hope that means I'm supposed to ace the LSAT in five days.

Flaw in the reasoning: Stimulus never stated that "niederbomb" does well/nor aces timed exams. Instead all we can gather is that for "niederbomb" timed exam scores > take home exam scores.

Sorry, I'm currently an LSAT machine.

Good god LS applicants are tools

lawschoollll wrote:Good god LS applicants are tools

IT doesn't end on matriculation.

Desert Fox wrote:

lawschoollll wrote:Good god LS applicants are tools

IT doesn't end on matriculation.

but CERTAINLY associates at law firms are exclusively edgy and cool???

OP: Weren't you sworn to secrecy about this ?

lawschoollll wrote:

Desert Fox wrote:

lawschoollll wrote:Good god LS applicants are tools

IT doesn't end on matriculation.

but CERTAINLY associates at law firms are exclusively edgy and cool???

No, according to many around here they're either showering in gold or begging on the streets.

minnbills wrote:

lawschoollll wrote:

Desert Fox wrote:

lawschoollll wrote:Good god LS applicants are tools

IT doesn't end on matriculation.

but CERTAINLY associates at law firms are exclusively edgy and cool???

No, according to many around here they're either showering in gold or begging on the streets.

22. Which of the following is an assumption on which this argument depends?

(A) Law school applicants are easily identifiable by the general public.
(B) Showering in gold is considered more edgy than begging on the streets.
(C) If showering in gold is edgy, then it is not cool, and vice versa.
(D) Associates at law firms are begging on the streets if they are not showering in gold.
(E) Wait, law firm associates aren't cool?

Get your rage on, bro. They're discriminating against your lower intelligence!

weren't you the same guy who was gonna off himself because he was having a bad day with the LSAT? You might consider taking a break from this test.

today i became got sick, coughing and flu. u guys think take in dec? ive only taken 4 testpreps, got 148, 160, 171, and today 160(while sick). also took testmasters.

will my peers think im a wuss?

testmachine45 wrote:today i became got sick, coughing and flu. u guys think take in dec? ive only taken 4 testpreps, got 148, 160, 171, and today 160(while sick). also took testmasters.

will my peers think im a wuss?

If by peers you mean people on this site, then yes. You are quite obviously a flame.

ha, you are wrong and a false accuser.

u r the flame in this sit.

St.Remy wrote:

testmachine45 wrote:today i became got sick, coughing and flu. u guys think take in dec? ive only taken 4 testpreps, got 148, 160, 171, and today 160(while sick). also took testmasters.

will my peers think im a wuss?

If by peers you mean people on this site, then yes. You are quite obviously a flame.

+1. I don't understand what drives these nerds to post stupid shit on an otherwise helpful message board. Go back to WoW and self-loathing.

beachbum wrote:

St.Remy wrote:

testmachine45 wrote:today i became got sick, coughing and flu. u guys think take in dec? ive only taken 4 testpreps, got 148, 160, 171, and today 160(while sick). also took testmasters.

will my peers think im a wuss?

If by peers you mean people on this site, then yes. You are quite obviously a flame.

+1. I don't understand what drives these nerds to post stupid shit on an otherwise helpful message board. Go back to WoW and self-loathing.

You are not being helpful, nor friendly, by attacking people, Beachbum. Beachbum has a contradiction in his argument.

Funny your econ major couldn't get you a better job than this shit you DAOL

EDIT: The nerd is you, with the econ major(that's fucking different), spiked hair(like your other frat members), and the hawaian shirt you where to keggers where u watch as your fellow frat boys probably wearing the same thing steal your woman. jersey shore POS.