Page 1 of 1
PT54 S1 Q10
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:57 pm
by gerbal
Hello. I cant seem to find anywhere in the passage where it supports D. Can anyone point me to the right place? Thanks.
Re: PT54 S1 Q10
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 10:07 pm
by gerbal
I guess it's around line 6-7? I was caught up with the answer choice saying "within or beneath" so tried trying to find instances where shallow was equated with within and deep wells equated with beneath but I think I was overthinking it.
Re: PT54 S1 Q10
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 12:25 am
by EarlCat
gerbal wrote:I guess it's around line 6-7? I was caught up with the answer choice saying "within or beneath" so tried trying to find instances where shallow was equated with within and deep wells equated with beneath but I think I was overthinking it.
Yeah. It's kinda weak support, but if oil weren't found either within or beneath layers of rock, there'd be no reason to drill into them.
Re: PT54 S1 Q10
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 6:33 pm
by MissLucky
Can someone please explain how (D) in question #8 is supported by one or both of the passages? I realize Passage B does discuss regulation, especially in line 35, but NOWHERE does it say that this is GOVERNMENT regulation. Furthermore, even if we go ahead and assume that it is GOVERNMENT regulation that Passage B is referring to (which I do not think we can do, of course), we don't know anything about its regulation regarding "drilling muds" - all we know is that the discharges (line 33) from drilling muds are regulated - IMO, there is never any information given upon which we can infer that drilling muds in and of themselves are regulated in terms of composition - all that is supported is that their discharges and their use are regulated (and who even knows if that comes from the gov't to begin with - maybe it's some company's policy!). Help? Thanks!
Re: PT54 S1 Q10
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 6:44 pm
by JJDancer
Yes line 35 brings up govt regulation but it is re-referenced in line 42, and 59
in the cases of BOTH WBM and OBM. Line 48 obviously tells us OBMs have 30% mineral oil and lines 55 on talk about residues from cuttings sieved from drilling fluids *muds* that can be discharged overboard.
Also I think in passage B, paragraph one it says "drilling mud, cuttings and associated chemicals are normally released...THESE discharges...and their use is tightly regulated" Implying that the drilling mud+cuttings+assoc chemicals are all part of "discharges"
Re: PT54 S1 Q10
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 6:58 pm
by MissLucky
JJDancer wrote:Yes line 35 brings up govt regulation but it is re-referenced in line 42, and 59
in the cases of BOTH WBM and OBM. Line 48 obviously tells us OBMs have 30% mineral oil and lines 55 on talk about residues from cuttings sieved from drilling fluids *muds* that can be discharged overboard.
Also I think in passage B, paragraph one it says "drilling mud, cuttings and associated chemicals are normally released...THESE discharges...and their use is tightly regulated" Implying that the drilling mud+cuttings+assoc chemicals are all part of "discharges"
OH. see, that makes sense. BUT, how do we figure this is GOVERNMENT regulation? is it that obvious that it would have to be gov't regulation?
Re: PT54 S1 Q10
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 7:13 pm
by JJDancer
MissLucky wrote:OH. see, that makes sense. BUT, how do we figure this is GOVERNMENT regulation? is it that obvious that it would have to be gov't regulation?
Regulation to me = govt regulation unless specified otherwise. Also it mentions that you need to comply to get an operating license etc.. I guess it COULD all be regulated by the industry somehow but I figured it was govt.
Re: PT54 S1 Q10
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:00 pm
by MissLucky
yeah, I guess that is fair to assume. Thank you !!!