Why do people say LG section is easier now?
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:28 pm
Just curious as to why people say the earlier games are harder than the new ones?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=128583
Personally I don't think they are, unless you mean the much earlier games that pop up sometimes on old PTs. These are difficult because of the unfamiliar format. Otherwise most of the famously difficult ones are recent (dinosaurs and photo/journalist interns for example).roballen wrote:Just curious as to why people say the earlier games are harder than the new ones?
Just look at the game with snakes and lizards. Holy mother of god. That game drove me crazy.kazu wrote:Yeah.. the recent ones tend to be more "standardized".. where as some of the old ones are just batshit crazy.
Yeah.. some of the old ones, if you don't get a certain inference right away you'll get a whole game wrong. Recent ones that's not so likely (with just 1 inference) - you'll probably just get a few, not the whole game.whymeohgodno wrote:Just look at the game with snakes and lizards. Holy mother of god. That game drove me crazy.kazu wrote:Yeah.. the recent ones tend to be more "standardized".. where as some of the old ones are just batshit crazy.
Really? I found the LG in preptest 58+59 pretty easy and I'm certainly no guru at LG section.7ED wrote:those who claim the games are easier I think are talking about the 40s series and some of the early 50s. if u've done any of the games from about 56-57 onward, they are just as hard as the 30s series (which is pretty damn tough).
Glad you named those two - the interns one is what caused me (well mostly) to get a 167 with 10 wrong on the LG in June and I ran into the dinosaurs game recently on a PT and was very discouraged - hearing that I'm not the only one who found those especially tough makes me feel a lot better...so thank youSt.Remy wrote:Personally I don't think they are, unless you mean the much earlier games that pop up sometimes on old PTs. These are difficult because of the unfamiliar format. Otherwise most of the famously difficult ones are recent (dinosaurs and photo/journalist interns for example).roballen wrote:Just curious as to why people say the earlier games are harder than the new ones?
I always thought the snakes & lizards game was tough.whymeohgodno wrote:Just look at the game with snakes and lizards. Holy mother of god. That game drove me crazy.kazu wrote:Yeah.. the recent ones tend to be more "standardized".. where as some of the old ones are just batshit crazy.
+1whymeohgodno wrote:Really? I found the LG in preptest 58+59 pretty easy and I'm certainly no guru at LG section.7ED wrote:those who claim the games are easier I think are talking about the 40s series and some of the early 50s. if u've done any of the games from about 56-57 onward, they are just as hard as the 30s series (which is pretty damn tough).
Yeah I do think the late 50s games are a bit harder, but I don't think they near the batshit craziness level of the early games (around 1~20s)7ED wrote:those who claim the games are easier I think are talking about the 40s series and some of the early 50s. if u've done any of the games from about 56-57 onward, they are just as hard as the 30s series (which is pretty damn tough).
PT 34 and 36 have pretty difficult games sections (doctors and buses).hypothalamus wrote:What PTs are supposed to have hard games (I mean PT numbers)? Or what games specifically are considered pretty tough, other than the two mentioned above?
I'm doing the 30s PTs right now, but since I am no LG whisperer, I don't know when a game is actually hard and when I'm just sleepy and when I'm just stupid. I generally find games that don't fit the standard molds most difficult, just because it takes more time to figure out the setup.