.
Posted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 4:26 pm
.
Did you originally post this under another name?
Anyway, yeah. That's why I only buy my LSAT stuff from Amazon.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=127296
Do you know when they started purchasing directly from LSAC? I bought 55-60 from Cambridge.MagnumLifeStyle wrote:i believe that some of their later PTs were purchased as PDF files directly from LSAC, so later ones are probably foul-proof.lparker wrote:Hm. Interesting. I was going to print 40-60 from Cambridge, but I will go with Amazon now.
My concern is with the earlier PTs. They may not reflect my true ability, as I could have missed a problem because of an omitted word or sentence.
I don't know which PTs were typed-up by one of Cambridge LSAT's employees, or purchased as PDF files.
I wouldn't be so anal about this if LSAT wasn't such a big deal in law school admissions.
Just ONE PROBLEM can distinguish a 169 from 170, Columbia from Harvard (ok may be two points), etc, which is why I'm very concerned about such defects.