Page 1 of 1
LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:40 pm
by nickbentley
Whats up guys...
I took my diagnostic last week and got a 160.
I've taken three diagnostics since then and pulled in a 151, a 151, and a 151.
Its safe to say, I'm a 151 scoring person right now...
The 160 that I got was PT9.
The 151's were from PT's in the 40's (i don't remember the exact number)
With that being said, I start the PowerScore full length next week. I will do every bit of the homework I'm given. period.
How much can I reasonably expect to gain throughout the course and before I take the LSAT in October?
Thanks!
Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:51 pm
by Tanicius
10 points at least I would say. I took a diagnostic and got a 155, did the PS bibles and got a 169. Both tests were relatively recent.
Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:36 pm
by Anaconda
Where did you see most of the decline in your score (LR/LR/RC, etc)? 160 to 151 is pretty big.
Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:40 pm
by kazu
Don't put too much importance on PT scores from before the 40s. PT 9 is a loooooooong time ago, the curve was much more lenient then, and the questions were a bit different as well.
Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:42 pm
by eandy
kazu wrote:Don't put too much importance on PT scores from before the 40s. PT 9 is a loooooooong time ago, the curve was much more lenient then, and the questions were a bit different as well.
This.
The really early PTs are very different from recent PTs.
Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:59 pm
by nickbentley
eandy wrote:kazu wrote:Don't put too much importance on PT scores from before the 40s. PT 9 is a loooooooong time ago, the curve was much more lenient then, and the questions were a bit different as well.
This.
The really early PTs are very different from recent PTs.
That is what I'm starting to figure out... I just don't want to run out of practice tests from PT40 and newer.
Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:04 am
by kazu
nickbentley wrote:eandy wrote:kazu wrote:Don't put too much importance on PT scores from before the 40s. PT 9 is a loooooooong time ago, the curve was much more lenient then, and the questions were a bit different as well.
This.
The really early PTs are very different from recent PTs.
That is what I'm starting to figure out... I just don't want to run out of practice tests from PT40 and newer.
Don't get me wrong, the early ones are very useful for practicing & honing your skills. Just don't put too much importance on the actual numerical score that you get.
Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:11 am
by yzero1
Your improvement will probably hinge on the nature of your mistakes. Are you finding yourself struggling with a particular section? Is the timing getting to you? Knowing your weaknesses and focusing on them will take you a long way in getting the score you want.