Page 1 of 1
which method is best
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:19 am
by anjmissy
i just started studying for the june 2011 lsat..and i was wondering, would it be best to study each section after the other like i have seen on different blogs or to mix it up. for example studying part of logic games part of logical reasoning and part of reading comp until you have finished all sections. right now i am reading the lg bible and after i plan on doing lr then tackling the lg workbook then working on my reading comp and at the end i will take the preptests that are not covered in the bibles. does anyone know off hand which preptests arent included?
Re: which method is best
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:21 am
by vespertiliovir
You have to find what works best for you.
Re: which method is best
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:30 am
by Precessional
A lot of us swear by PithyPike's guide:
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =6&t=41657
Over 12 months, you can probably study however you like. With a more compressed study schedule-- say, over 3 months-- it is probably beneficial to juggle studying for all three sections in a week. I'm supposing that a diet of consistent practice is good for preventing rust. I've read stories on this forum where long lay-offs (in long-term prep or between LSAT tests) have resulted in serious drops in practice-test scores.
Re: which method is best
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:50 am
by glucose101
"You have to find what works best for you."
+1
I couldn't handle doing everything all at once, so I didn't. I like to focus on one thing, improve, and see myself progress.