Let's say, for example, that on PT 25, the range between lowest and highest raw score to get 171 was 85 - 87 (hypothetically).
But on PT 50, the range to get 171 was 90 - 92.
Does this mean that PT 50 was relatively easer than PT 25? (more people got better scores, and thus the raw score needed to get 171 was raised?)
I'm not too familiar with scales, so I'd appreciate any feedback. Thanks! =)
Can You Tell the Difficulty of a PT By Its Scale? Forum
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 9:53 pm
- Nulli Secundus
- Posts: 3175
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:19 am
Re: Can You Tell the Difficulty of a PT By Its Scale?
Yes that is what basically using a bell curve amounts to.
- balzern
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 2:27 pm
Re: Can You Tell the Difficulty of a PT By Its Scale?
For the most part yes. But "difficulty" is pretty relative. I found December 2009 to be really easy, yet it had an outrageous curve. Honestly, I think it really depends on the question types that are on a given test. These reflect PERSONAL difficulty, which, IMO, isn't reflected necessarily by the curve.
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Can You Tell the Difficulty of a PT By Its Scale?
Yes. The raw score required for each scaled score is adjusted on each test to make sure the percentiles (the number of people getting each scaled score) remain roughtly equivalent across administrations.MagnumLifeStyle wrote:Does this mean that PT 50 was relatively easer than PT 25? (more people got better scores, and thus the raw score needed to get 171 was raised?)
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login