Page 1 of 1
How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:15 am
by chewdak
more or less
Re: How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:42 am
by Eliyahu7
Can you be a little more specific?
Re: How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:58 am
by chewdak
Eliyahu7 wrote:Can you be a little more specific?
I would struggle to answer a similar question myself, perhaps someone insightful gave it some thought
for instance,
more emphasis on ... less emphasis on ...
the games are similar to such and such PTs
RC questions are like ...
LR questions are ...
Re: How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:02 am
by am060459
not answering your question but hope this is helpful
LG was harder than usual
RC was average
LR was tricky but nonetheless average
i dont know if anyone can answer your question regarding the sections similarity to other PTs.
Re: How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 2:45 am
by chewdak
am060459 wrote:not answering your question but hope this is helpful
LG was harder than usual
RC was average
LR was tricky but nonetheless average
i dont know if anyone can answer your question regarding the sections similarity to other PTs.
It is helpful,
I hope you are right and no one can answer that.
Better use time thinking about other things.
Re: How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 9:05 am
by Audio Technica Guy
I wouldn't even necessarily say ythe games were so much harder as much as I'd say they hit you with basically the same type over and over. If you are a 2D games master, you nailed that games section. If you're more a group games kind of guy, you struggled.
Re: How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:56 pm
by shoop
chewdak wrote:more or less
The second LR section was a dirty whore.
Re: How do June 2010 sections compare with other recent tests?
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:08 pm
by GettingReady2010
am060459 wrote:not answering your question but hope this is helpful
LG was harder than usual
RC was average
LR was tricky but nonetheless average
i dont know if anyone can answer your question regarding the sections similarity to other PTs.
This is exactly how I would have put it.