Experimental Section with extended time?
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:15 pm
Does anyone know if you are granted extra time on the lsat if you have to take the experimental section or do these test takers get a different test format?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=121517
Taking this thread off-topic, but it really does not have anywhere to go. Is the LSAT completely funded by test takers? I think LSAC is non-profit, right?mayday wrote:Also worth noting that not everyone has the same experimental sections (so you can easily figure out which was which after the test by talking to people). The experimental section is also usually one of the first three sections of the LSAT. In a way, anyone who takes the LSAT is forking out $136 to help LSAC develop its tests.
I have been told by people that took an extended time LSAT that they got the same four sections, and did not get an experimental section.roballen wrote:Does anyone know if you are granted extra time on the lsat if you have to take the experimental section or do these test takers get a different test format?
justinmcl wrote: Taking this thread off-topic, but it really does not have anywhere to go. Is the LSAT completely funded by test takers? I think LSAC is non-profit, right?
Forgot about that, they made even more off of me through prep tests!bp colin wrote:justinmcl wrote: Taking this thread off-topic, but it really does not have anywhere to go. Is the LSAT completely funded by test takers? I think LSAC is non-profit, right?
They get a steady revenue stream from us prep courses. We have to pay licensing fees to give students complete sets of problems. And then there are all the prep tests that they sell individually. And their books.
Yeah, but they still do make a shitload of money off of LSATs given. In the 09-10 LSAT cycle they administered 170k tests. Multiply that by $136 and you've got 23 million dollars (although I'm not taking fee waivers into account).justinmcl wrote:Forgot about that, they made even more off of me through prep tests!bp colin wrote:justinmcl wrote: Taking this thread off-topic, but it really does not have anywhere to go. Is the LSAT completely funded by test takers? I think LSAC is non-profit, right?
They get a steady revenue stream from us prep courses. We have to pay licensing fees to give students complete sets of problems. And then there are all the prep tests that they sell individually. And their books.
True. If you get extended time, there is no experimental section included. Also you may have to take the test on a different date than the actual exam date, depending on where you take the exam. As in, instead of June 7, take it June 8.Grond wrote:I have been told by people that took an extended time LSAT that they got the same four sections, and did not get an experimental section.roballen wrote:Does anyone know if you are granted extra time on the lsat if you have to take the experimental section or do these test takers get a different test format?
Oh, your questions makes a lot more sense now. I guess I'm the confused oneGrond wrote:I have been told by people that took an extended time LSAT that they got the same four sections, and did not get an experimental section.roballen wrote:Does anyone know if you are granted extra time on the lsat if you have to take the experimental section or do these test takers get a different test format?
Haha, it's okay.cinefile 17 wrote:Oh, your questions makes a lot more sense now. I guess I'm the confused oneGrond wrote:I have been told by people that took an extended time LSAT that they got the same four sections, and did not get an experimental section.roballen wrote:Does anyone know if you are granted extra time on the lsat if you have to take the experimental section or do these test takers get a different test format?
snowfight wrote:True. If you get extended time, there is no experimental section included. Also you may have to take the test on a different date than the actual exam date, depending on where you take the exam. As in, instead of June 7, take it June 8.Grond wrote:I have been told by people that took an extended time LSAT that they got the same four sections, and did not get an experimental section.roballen wrote:Does anyone know if you are granted extra time on the lsat if you have to take the experimental section or do these test takers get a different test format?
yup. i did - time and a half. happy to answer any questions. but fyi, once i receive me score from this test (im hoping today), i might not check this site for a little while so best bet is to pm me and give me your email.roballen wrote:Haha, it's okay.cinefile 17 wrote:Oh, your questions makes a lot more sense now. I guess I'm the confused oneGrond wrote:I have been told by people that took an extended time LSAT that they got the same four sections, and did not get an experimental section.roballen wrote:Does anyone know if you are granted extra time on the lsat if you have to take the experimental section or do these test takers get a different test format?
snowfight wrote:True. If you get extended time, there is no experimental section included. Also you may have to take the test on a different date than the actual exam date, depending on where you take the exam. As in, instead of June 7, take it June 8.Grond wrote:I have been told by people that took an extended time LSAT that they got the same four sections, and did not get an experimental section.roballen wrote:Does anyone know if you are granted extra time on the lsat if you have to take the experimental section or do these test takers get a different test format?
Have you taken the exam with extended time? If not, is there anyone that you would be able to put me in contact with who has?