Page 1 of 1
Logic Games
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:40 pm
by NJcollegestudent
Has anyone experienced a rapid improvement in logic games? I am still waiting for my lg bible, and for the past few weeks on any lg set i have been getting -10 -12, and i just sat down and did a new set, and i only got -4. Is it understood that scores vary per logic games section, or should they be consistent.
Re: Logic Games
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:14 pm
by unattended bag
I just finished the LGB, and the first 3 full sections I did were -7, -11 and -5. I just did 3 more sections today and went -6, -5, -4. I think the more sections you do, the more consistent you will be. The LGB will be a huge help for you.
Re: Logic Games
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:07 am
by mst
Don't take that one -4 for granted... LG is a section that performance often can vary wildly on. For people who typically get -0, they just have to misread 1 rule or have a problem with one setup to get a -7. For people who typically get -7, they just have to get lucky with one game to really make a huge difference. Thus, it's hard to guage performance sometimes with this section. When you can achieve that -4 a couple times in a row, then you'll know you've made progress (and this refers primarily to the recent games... games from pt's 1-25ish are pretty darn bad indicators of what logic games are like today).
Re: Logic Games
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:08 pm
by Anaconda
mst wrote:Don't take that one -4 for granted... LG is a section that performance often can vary wildly on. For people who typically get -0, they just have to misread 1 rule or have a problem with one setup to get a -7. For people who typically get -7, they just have to get lucky with one game to really make a huge difference. Thus, it's hard to guage performance sometimes with this section. When you can achieve that -4 a couple times in a row, then you'll know you've made progress (and this refers primarily to the recent games... games from pt's 1-25ish are pretty darn bad indicators of what logic games are like today).
How exactly are the bad indicators? Too easy?
Re: Logic Games
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:20 pm
by zworykin
mst wrote:(and this refers primarily to the recent games... games from pt's 1-25ish are pretty darn bad indicators of what logic games are like today).
Or so we've assumed. Stone/mulch, anyone?
