June 2010 CURVE Predictions Forum

[James Bond]

-7.

Go play in traffic

[Dany]

-7.

[thesealocust]

never mind

[oxford_don]

[]

[hellojd]

soooo... imho i thought rc/lr was manageable.. but thought lg was difficult.

heres to hopin for -12+

[budafied]

I would LOVE a -12 or so.

[Shrimps]

-12 would've been perfect, but RC was easy, LR was average, and the games apparently only slightly harder than average. I'm hoping for a -11, afraid of -10.

[2014]

To whoever looked up the trend for June tests since 02, what is the trend usually for the Sept/Oct test? Is the curve on it usually more or less favorable than June?

[AbraCadabra91]

.

[Knock]

guessing -12

[jarofsoup]

guessing -12

I think it will be the exact same as Dec.

[3|ink]

guessing -12

I think it will be the exact same as Dec.

December was unprecedented.

[jarofsoup]

guessing -12

I think it will be the exact same as Dec.

December was unprecedented.

A lot of people were completely flustered by the games. People outside my test center were crying.

[shotsfired12]

.

[hellojd]

guessing -12

I think it will be the exact same as Dec.

December was unprecedented.

A lot of people were completely flustered by the games. People outside my test center were crying.

I don't get it... I can literally do any LG section from PT 40-59 in 35 minutes easy... and yet I struggled on these LG. WHY?! I knew the only thing that would throw me off on this test could be LG, and lo and behold, thank you LSAC.

Unfortunately, I don't think the LR and RC was too difficult, so the curve won't even be that great...

[iamcutdacheck]

guessing -12

I think it will be the exact same as Dec.

December was unprecedented.

Welcome to standardized testing during a recession! There were ALOT of people taking the LSAT at USC, whatever you want to infer about that please do so but I agree with the -11 or -12 curve.

[JasonR]

guessing -12

I think it will be the exact same as Dec.

December was unprecedented.

Welcome to standardized testing during a recession! There were ALOT of people taking the LSAT at USC, whatever you want to infer about that please do so but I agree with the -11 or -12 curve.

Wrong. The recession has nothing to do with the scoring scale. The test is not curved.

[Jkf esq]

LR and RC were, relatively speaking, ordinary
the games were a bit funky

though i'd like to say that it was a massively difficult test...it probably wasn't, and unfortunately, i think we're looking at another -10


sigh. sigh. sigh.

I agree aside from the mulch game it wasn't anything too funky. The last game got difficult because of the time you spent trying to figure out the mulch

[mkr5u]

I hate mulch...

[jpSartre]

I can't see more than -10 on a 100 question test.

[Fark-o-vision]

I don't know. The "Real" LG completely murdered me. It didn't seem that hard, but it was an absolute kick to the nads after doing the experimental LG. If LSAC had any heart they would have put the real one first and the experimental after. I blew past that experimental thinking I was easily in for a 175+ only to be absolutely blindsided by the much, much more difficult real section.

Not only was it harder, but it kind of broke my spirit.

[Jkf esq]

I think where the LG was hard the other sections made up for it so I think the curve will be 10

[jjlaw]

I didn't think this test was as hard as PT59. Though the LG was a curveball (still not sure how I did really), I thought the LR and RC were average. Maybe the second LR was a bit harder.

I'm going to say -11 to be generous, but most likely -10.

[risktaker]

-12 (Please baby Jesus, if you love me)

[Albatross]

-11 at the very least. LG was ridiculously hard. Ive never seen a game like the last one.