Top Law Schools

Anyone else buy PT 58 from Cambridge LSAT? On the first RC passage it cuts off mid-sentence on line 59 for me. It's almost finished but I paid full price. This shouldn't happen. If anyone could type the rest of it for me starting with line 60 (a dress for the small statue...) that would be great Then I'm asking for a refund

"for the small statue would have taken nine months to produce."

(and they all lived happily ever after.)

THE END



-Steve

Hey thanks lol. Seven words missing from the end. It still kinda ruined my whole PT. I looked at the questions to see if there was some new question type where you finish the sentence or something. They wouldn't give me a refund because I saw the material but they said they fixed the problem. Apparently I'm the first person to ever call in about this. I'm surprised.

Glad to help.

I guess most people who took the Cambridge version before you didn't even bother reading to the end of the passage because it was so boring

Sorry to hear Cambridge won't give you a refund. I'm kinda surprised, since he seems like a good guy. Maybe if you explain that it ruined the PT for you, he'll come around.

weird i took this one from cambridge a few days ago and didn't even notice. Remember the passage and the statues they were talking about though - that the cloth, or something, couldn't have been produced for one. Sounds like it might have been just yours?

Saltqjibo wrote:weird i took this one from cambridge a few days ago and didn't even notice. Remember the passage and the statues they were talking about though - that the cloth, or something, couldn't have been produced for one. Sounds like it might have been just yours?

No, because when I called him he looked this up and fixed it. He was also surprised that no one had ever brought this up before. Not sure how anyone could get a decent score in RC and not notice this. No offense I'm not very good, but this jumped out at me. Maybe cuz I was a journalism major?