Page 1 of 1
Dec. 2009 PT
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 9:49 pm
by jdhopeful11
Is it me or was this test especially hard?
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 10:30 pm
by confusedlawyer
andyman wrote:Is it me or was this test especially hard?
Its you. No I'm kidding, did you not look at the curve? 81/101 is a 165. Haven't taken it yet but I am not looking forward to it. What was so hard about it if you don't mind me asking?
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 10:39 pm
by jdhopeful11
I was just brushing up and my PT score dropped from consistently mid 160's to a 155 on this test (all testing conditions being similar)

Re: Dec. 2009 PT
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 11:13 pm
by dominkay
It was especially hard. My score dropped from consistently mid-170s to 169. I thought the reading comp was ridiculous (I don't remember the last time I got more than -1 on RC).
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 1:14 am
by UTexas
It was significantly harder than average (hence the lovely scoring scale). I hated life when I left the testing center, and I debated canceling up until the very last minute. Very glad I didn't end up making that all-timer of a mistake.
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 1:16 am
by hellokitty
Yes it's hard! I was reviewing this test tonight also. It was brutal when I took it in Dec.
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 1:43 am
by lebob
dec09 is the reason i need to suffer through this test one last time on june 7th.
LR, LG was doable for me, but the RC. Oh lord, the RC...
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 2:48 am
by honestabe84
When all of you say the test was "hard," are you saying that you had a low raw score but the curve fit the test, or are you saying that you scored lower than usual.
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 2:52 am
by StrictlyLiable
I think that since they say the curve was larger and they scored worse I imagine their raw score was less than usual. I was wondering, what made the RC so much more difficult?
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
Posted: Sun May 30, 2010 3:06 am
by lebob
StrictlyLiable wrote:I think that since they say the curve was larger and they scored worse I imagine their raw score was less than usual. I was wondering, what made the RC so much more difficult?
the questions (not trying to be clever).
the passages were tough, but the questions were even tougher
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 1:20 am
by JasonR
Tough test.
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 4:29 pm
by bp colin
lebob wrote:StrictlyLiable wrote:I think that since they say the curve was larger and they scored worse I imagine their raw score was less than usual. I was wondering, what made the RC so much more difficult?
the questions (not trying to be clever).
the passages were tough, but the questions were even tougher
Yeah, the third RC passage about Noguchi was kinda hard, but the questions were just atrocious. #16 especially.
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 11:34 pm
by hellokitty
The LG games section was pretty easy compared to other tests I thought. Although, those rule substitution questions kind of threw me for a loop.