December 2009 LSAT, Section II (LR1), Question 15, 16, 20
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 2:12 am
Sorry I don't have the number for this LSAT. I actually took it. What is the key term? Theory? Thanks.
This is the one with Bowers and anarchy. I kept thinking there would be a flaw with the conditional statements at the end but they seem okay. Is that right... Question 15
Question 16 - B is wrong because it has two exceptions? I see how E is the better answer but B seems to follow similar reasoning as well?
Question 20 - is the big one I don't understand still. B and E are pretty tempting. I don't really see how I could have narrowed it down to D on test day. if someone can explain that one to me that'd be great. thanks. i'm an idiot.
This is the one with Bowers and anarchy. I kept thinking there would be a flaw with the conditional statements at the end but they seem okay. Is that right... Question 15
Question 16 - B is wrong because it has two exceptions? I see how E is the better answer but B seems to follow similar reasoning as well?
Question 20 - is the big one I don't understand still. B and E are pretty tempting. I don't really see how I could have narrowed it down to D on test day. if someone can explain that one to me that'd be great. thanks. i'm an idiot.