December 2009 LSAT, Section II (LR1), Question 15, 16, 20 Forum

[bartleby]

Sorry I don't have the number for this LSAT. I actually took it. What is the key term? Theory? Thanks.

This is the one with Bowers and anarchy. I kept thinking there would be a flaw with the conditional statements at the end but they seem okay. Is that right... Question 15

Question 16 - B is wrong because it has two exceptions? I see how E is the better answer but B seems to follow similar reasoning as well?

Question 20 - is the big one I don't understand still. B and E are pretty tempting. I don't really see how I could have narrowed it down to D on test day. if someone can explain that one to me that'd be great. thanks. i'm an idiot.

[bartleby]

Nvm, i got it off the atlas lsat website, which is great.

[matt@atlaslsat]

Isn't it! I'm a moderator for the Atlas forum. You'll see me and a team of other great instructors answer any question related to the LSAT there.

So, don't hesitate to ask if you ever need to work through a question with somebody!

Good luck in your prep!