Page 1 of 1
For Feb 2010: How did you score compared to average PT's?
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:22 pm
by HiLine
After voting, could you please share your thoughts on whether we should have a poll for all tests?
Re: For Feb 2010: How did you score compared to average PT's?
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:24 am
by jdhopeful11
I am curious to know how I did... I feel like the pressure and adrenaline that I was faced with boosted my PT score
Re: For Feb 2010: How did you score compared to average PT's?
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:15 pm
by tikiman6
177.6 >> 176.
Re: For Feb 2010: How did you score compared to average PT's?
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:46 pm
by pinkzeppelin
I thought I had just been burned out in december, so I didn't study at all and took the test again in February. I scored much higher. Don't burn yourself out, resting for me did the trick.
Re: For Feb 2010: How did you score compared to average PT's?
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:59 pm
by eros
PT avg: 164-166. Feb Score: 166. I was satisfied with the 166 as I finally got a score that was pretty consistent with my PT (I got a 158 in sept and a 159 in dec.)
Re: For Feb 2010: How did you score compared to average PT's?
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 1:37 am
by DarkPhantom
6 points higher...from the 140s to the 150s....games raped me this time around, was near perfect last time.
Re: For Feb 2010: How did you score compared to average PT's?
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 1:56 am
by tomwatts
I put "the same," though the details are that I did PT 57 in September and pulled off 1 lower than test day, then PT 58 a week before the February test and got exactly the same score as on the test.
I'm surprised at the number of people who just tanked on this test. I know that it happens, but I didn't realize that it was this common.