Top Law Schools

I'm wondering if anyone can see any problems with the study schedule/guide I've designed for myself. Am I missing anything?

I originally planned taking the test last December but wasn't hitting my target in early November so I pushed off until this June. At that time I had read both Bibles and was mainly focusing on LR and some RC.

Here's my plan leading up until June...

- Review LR by type using the Cambridge LSAT Bundle. I'm spending about 4-5 days (two days untimed, two/three days timed) on each of my most problematic question types and 2-3 days on the others. I've planned to end the LR review by May 1st.

- At least two LG's each day before starting LR review.

- One RC section every other day until May 1st (untimed until mid-March).

- The last week of April I plan to review problem LR questions that I missed in the initial review. I also plan to take timed 4-section PT's of only LR's, LG's and RC's for five days. (Regarding this, I will take LR, LG, and RC sections from PT's 44-48 and make 4-section PT's with that material.)

- Beginning May 1st I'll begin timed PT's. I plan to do two each week (Wednesday and Saturday) until Wednesday, June 2nd, and review the PT's on off-days.

I work full time so I'm not sure how much I can squeeze into this schedule. Can anyone see anything wrong with this, though? Am I spending too much time on one area and not enough on another? Any tips would be great.

Thanks.

-

Anybody? I'm looking for any comments on this. What are your thoughts about this schedule? Does it look too narrow, like I'm not doing enough, or would you scale back the PT's in the final month? Any comments would be great.

Personally I wouldn't study for any more than 3-4 months. But then again, I'm just a guy who got a phat T14 scholly.

...

T_14 - that's a hilarious avatar!