Top Law Schools

I am preparing for the June exam but my friends told me that the June exam is usually weird comparing to the Oct one.
any thoughts on that?
I wanna take the June one coz I think it would give me more time to prepare for application afterwards. But my friends told me that taking the Oct still can guarantee me enough time to prepare and send application before the deadlines.

any thoughts on that?


thanks a lot.

....

coz I don't feel comfortable to prepare for application before I see my real score.

idoubtit wrote:I am preparing for the June exam but my friends told me that the June exam is usually weird comparing to the Oct one.
any thoughts on that?
I wanna take the June one coz I think it would give me more time to prepare for application afterwards. But my friends told me that taking the Oct still can guarantee me enough time to prepare and send application before the deadlines.

any thoughts on that?


thanks a lot.

Don't really have much to say, so I'll let this guy speak for me...

idoubtit wrote:coz I don't feel comfortable to prepare for application before I see my real score.

Believe me, as someone who went through the last/application process, your application will still be the same crap no matter what your score. A 170 or a 150 won't change the content of your PS/ your LORs/ resume.

what? u said score is not important????? then why people are still studying so hard?

idoubtit wrote:what? u said score is not important????? then why people are still studying so hard?

Just throw in the towel, bra. Just throw it in.

is there anyone serious here to answer my questions?

The test in June 2010 will be the hardest test ever.

you guys suck........

While I can't speak in terms of actually writing the June test and the October test, I can tell you that I wrote the June '09 and felt like it was pretty much on par with the practice tests I had taken. Did your friends mention what they considered specifically weird? Personally, I am glad that I wrote in June. I had most of my apps done by mid-October and I felt like it gave me more time to research schools (beforehand) that would be a good fit for my splitter self.

Chromakey wrote:While I can't speak in terms of actually writing the June test and the October test, I can tell you that I wrote the June '09 and felt like it was pretty much on par with the practice tests I had taken. Did your friends mention what they considered specifically weird? Personally, I am glad that I wrote in June. I had most of my apps done by mid-October and I felt like it gave me more time to research schools (beforehand) that would be a good fit for my splitter self.

thanks a lot......that's what I wanna hear....I will take the June one then:))))

Take June. You don't have to wake up super early. And no, the June tests are not particularly "weird".

keg411 wrote:Take June. You don't have to wake up super early. And no, the June tests are not particularly "weird".

thanks a lot Keg411, I really have a hard time waking up early....June test time sounds perfect for me.lol

Everyone knows June tests are the weirdest and hardest; especially in even numbered years.

jetlagz28 wrote:Everyone knows June tests are the weirdest and hardest; especially in even numbered years.

haha, yea:)

....

idoubtit wrote:I am preparing for the June exam but my friends told me that the June exam is usually weird comparing to the Oct one.
any thoughts on that?

idoubtit

idoubtit wrote:is there anyone serious here to answer my questions?

idoubtit

Dude, are you seriously this dim-witted?

Why are you asking people if June is weird compared to October? Go out and buy the last 5 June administrations and the last 5 October administrations. Do them. Then answer the question for yourself.

Second, your score should not be a factor in the writing of your personal statement (unless, of course, your score is so shit that it would make the writing of it, much less the putting together of your whole application, pointless)

Now grow up and stop acting like a fucking baby.

You know, I felt that 57-59 really were a group, with the "replace a rule" questions and the "we [heart] In/Out games" distributions of game types, and that's a group that begins with a June test. Obviously, in '07, Comparative Reading began with the June test. This makes me wonder if there is something to the idea that June is the date on which new trends begin. Usually applicants for the following year take the June, September/October, or December tests, or they take February of the same year, so LSAC's calendar runs more or less June-February (which was the reason for starting the Comparative Reading in June), so this isn't impossible.

Still, I never noticed this before PT 57 (granted, I wasn't looking for it), so it seems pretty unlikely.

Sauer Grapes wrote:

idoubtit wrote:what? u said score is not important????? then why people are still studying so hard?

140

That a prediction, Sauer?

my practice score right now average is 171....

....

Sauer Grapes wrote:

stratocophic wrote:

Sauer Grapes wrote:

idoubtit wrote:what? u said score is not important????? then why people are still studying so hard?

140

That a prediction, Sauer?

Not a prediction, but a response to the reading comprehension showed by his response.

If he's practicing at a 171 right now, then the answer above is just for a type of question he has struggles.

I don't struggle for anything, I just don't understand why you guys are so hostile and immature:)