Page 1 of 6

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:03 pm
by charlesxavier
Started out with the LG section that I assume was the real one. I didn't do too well. I think the nerves got me on this one. My other LG section went a lot smoother too bad it appears to be experimental. All of the real LG questions were time wasters.

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:04 pm
by Gwen
Peter North wrote:Can we keep this thread limited to LG? Anyways, I had 2 LGs (one obviously was the exp. section - either way, both LGs were brutal. I did well on the pure sequencing/grouping games... the rest, damn. I got shafted. :cry:

How did LG go for you guys? The consensus I get is pretty much everyone got burned.
You're wrong

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:04 pm
by Bruiser
I also had 2 LG sections. Each one had one game that really threw me. I ran out of time on the 2nd LG and had to quickly read and make an educated guess. So, out of 8 total games, 3 I found pretty easy, 2 really hard, and 3 moderate. If I had more time, even a few more minutes, I know I could have gotten it. I thought I was doing better on LG but I never could develop my speed where it needed it to be.
The stupid apartment game KILLED me, I really couldn't figure it out. I doubt I got all of them wrong, but unless I am luckily, I got most of them wrong.

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:14 pm
by eros
Bruiser wrote:I also had 2 LG sections. Each one had one game that really threw me. I ran out of time on the 2nd LG and had to quickly read and make an educated guess. So, out of 8 total games, 3 I found pretty easy, 2 really hard, and 3 moderate. If I had more time, even a few more minutes, I know I could have gotten it. I thought I was doing better on LG but I never could develop my speed where it needed it to be.
The stupid apartment game KILLED me, I really couldn't figure it out. I doubt I got all of them wrong, but unless I am luckily, I got most of them wrong.
aprartments weren't real, that should cheer you up :P

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:17 pm
by Breaker
Peter North wrote:the Gatherings and Heartfire game PWNED me big time.
I did really well on that one, do we know if that's real or experimental?

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:19 pm
by drwho97
I FELT RAPED BY THE GAMES SECTION LOL.

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:31 pm
by 20121109
I dk...LG was pretty fair to me. Definitely not among one of the hardest LG sections I've encountered. Let's hope you did better than you think :)

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:32 pm
by s0ph1e2007
Peter North wrote:the Gatherings and Heartfire game PWNED me big time.
this is the one i think i got a few wrong on

your first section (no matter what it was) was your experimental section btw


LG... idk what to say. i never get lg questions wrong and im sure i did this time
I hope the curve is old school and is like -14 or something :|

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:33 pm
by Relientkate
I totally came here hoping to be told that the section containing the freaking hiking game was the real one, the first one was experiment... crap.

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:34 pm
by can'tbelievei'mhere
Yeah, so I know there is one guy floating around on these boards who is loving being smug about how easy the LGs were. Great, good for you, go away.

I thought the real LG was hard - because nothing was definite, because all of the games were similar (i.e. no sequencing, nothing to pin down), because all were time-wasters, etc. And I personally thought these games were especially hard because I happened to get them first!

Basically I left the test room miserable. Without that LG I think I might have had a shot at a score I think I'm capable of/ is representative of my abilities. Instead, with the LG we got - who knows!? I am so bitter. I could have been in a different chair, and received a different test, and I might have taken that LG in any section other than first. Maybe that would have helped. Or I could have taken ANY OTHER F-ING LSAT (yes, including the June 2009 test, with the dinosaur game that was NOT that hard) and I would have been fine with the LGs.

The LSAC is fascist, the LSAT is so capricious and infuriating, and I am screwed.

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:36 pm
by charlesxavier
Wait, so hiking was experimental?

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:36 pm
by aristotle1776
sophie2007,

I'm curious to know what your basing the statement "the first section on all tests was experimental" on?

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:37 pm
by theadw
Peter North wrote:Yep, same here.

No idea. I forget. Expect that game and the juicer/mixer one, I did well on every other one, including the Faculty/Student presentation, the Friday/Saturday thing, etc.

This is how it went for me.

1 - LG (Real, this was hard).
2 - LR (Real)
3 - LG (Experimental)
Break
4 - LR (Real, but way too much BS science/anthropology questions)
5 - RC (Real, the last one about the language was brutal, I guess on that).

How do I know this? In my test center, this guy and this chick had only one LG and it was the LG from my # 1.

Either way, LG was a hit and miss. Both LGs were pretty hard IMO.

HTH
Whatever group of games had the juicer / mixer set & the hiking / trails set was real. I had an experimental RC.

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:39 pm
by trutherd
I had 2 LG's, did horrible on both (normally my strength), I'm depressed and deflated, my brain is mush, I can't remember anything about any of the questions.

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:40 pm
by idkmybffjill
What was the hiking game about again?

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:42 pm
by Thirteen
Agreed. During prep, I routinely missed 0 or 1. I think I might have missed at least 6 on today's test :oops: . FML.

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:45 pm
by TheOtherJen
theadw wrote:
Peter North wrote:Yep, same here.

No idea. I forget. Expect that game and the juicer/mixer one, I did well on every other one, including the Faculty/Student presentation, the Friday/Saturday thing, etc.

This is how it went for me.

1 - LG (Real, this was hard).
2 - LR (Real)
3 - LG (Experimental)
Break
4 - LR (Real, but way too much BS science/anthropology questions)
5 - RC (Real, the last one about the language was brutal, I guess on that).

How do I know this? In my test center, this guy and this chick had only one LG and it was the LG from my # 1.

Either way, LG was a hit and miss. Both LGs were pretty hard IMO.

HTH
Whatever group of games had the juicer / mixer set & the hiking / trails set was real. I had an experimental RC.
Yup, same here. Does anyone remember the first game? I couldn't even figure out the rules, they didn't make sense!

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:47 pm
by charlesxavier
TheOtherJen wrote:
theadw wrote:
Peter North wrote:Yep, same here.

No idea. I forget. Expect that game and the juicer/mixer one, I did well on every other one, including the Faculty/Student presentation, the Friday/Saturday thing, etc.

This is how it went for me.

1 - LG (Real, this was hard).
2 - LR (Real)
3 - LG (Experimental)
Break
4 - LR (Real, but way too much BS science/anthropology questions)
5 - RC (Real, the last one about the language was brutal, I guess on that).

How do I know this? In my test center, this guy and this chick had only one LG and it was the LG from my # 1.

Either way, LG was a hit and miss. Both LGs were pretty hard IMO.

HTH
Whatever group of games had the juicer / mixer set & the hiking / trails set was real. I had an experimental RC.
Yup, same here. Does anyone remember the first game? I couldn't even figure out the rules, they didn't make sense!
It was hiking for me.

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:47 pm
by aristotle1776
My initial presumption was that on the LG LR LG LR RC test...the second LG was experimental. However I'm truly curious as to why sophie2007 believes section 1 on all tests was experimental (mainly because I did much better on the second LG than the first).

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:48 pm
by charlesxavier
aristotle1776 wrote:My initial presumption was that on the LG LR LG LR RC test...the second LG was experimental. However I'm truly curious as to why sophie2007 believes section 1 on all tests was experimental (mainly because I did much better on the second LG than the first).
It doesn't matter which order it was. With games some people had the experimental section 1st and others 3rd.

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:51 pm
by Swamp Monster
Juicers, Hiking, Classes were real. I had it first, some appeared not to. Thought it was tough and wasted too much time brainfarting at beginning but rushed through and luckily figured out juicers and got back to first two games to get most of them, but I tend to think I made a few careless errors in my haste. Sounds like almost everyone thought they were hard and in my experience games are most closely tied to section to curve so perhaps it will be lenient again.

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:51 pm
by zreinhar
I def skipped around.. the juicer game, the trail game, the class with 2 terms, and there was a sequencing with a bunch of or statements.. those threw me for a loop. the games wasnt too bad for me, it was definitely hard, but i had to only guess on like 3, I had LG LR RC LR RC, my first RC was really easy compared to my second.. it kinda sucked.. i just jumped around alot, if a question didn't seem easy or took loner than a minute I moved on, that might be the only reason i did (though prob didnt) do well on games..

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:53 pm
by aristotle1776
I understand what you're saying, but if the first section on all tests was experimental then it goes against what everyone else is stating concerning the real versus dummy LG sections (i.e. I had the one with juicers first and the easier one in the third section). Forgot to mention that part initially.

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:53 pm
by Relientkate
Swamp Monster wrote:Juicers, Hiking, Classes were real. I had it first, some appeared not to. Thought it was tough and wasted too much time brainfarting at beginning but rushed through and luckily figured out juicers and got back to first two games to get most of them, but I tend to think I made a few careless errors in my haste. Sounds like almost everyone thought they were hard and in my experience games are most closely tied to section to curve so perhaps it will be lenient again.
I'm so confused... I thought that the second lg was hiking, classes, a game about a gatherings play, and a game about assigning workers to work on a fri or saturday. My brain must be mushed right now.

Re: LG OWNED me. (LG talk ONLY in this thread, thanks)

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 4:55 pm
by Swamp Monster
I think we can agree that the people who say the 1st was experimental for all are mistaken, unless people are lying about what games they had. I definitely had juicers/hiking/classes first and that appears to be real.