Top Law Schools

*

the harder was real

I had one logic games and two reading comps, and the logic games was SO HARD. I completely bombed it, guessed on ten questions. I didn't even understand the first game enough to attempt it, the rules seemed to contradict themselves. I probably read them wrong but I just ended up skipping it and trying the others which didn't turn out to be any easier.

I had sections 1 and 3 for LG. I found the first one to be much easier (with the exception of 1 game), so, given my luck, that will be the experimental. Truthfully, I don't even remember the games (except the apartments). My mind is mush. I actually ran out of time on the second LG, so I had to make some "educated guesses" and "C is the best answer" moves. Luckily, I found both LR fairly easy.

agree
i have never had a time issue on lg before
had a time issue today

everything else was strangely easy

hopefully they curved it appropriately
-2 (optimally 3) instead of -1 for 180

i'm in the same boat as OP, and i am unfortunately coming to the conclusion that the harder (and for me, first) LG was the real one. FML

somewhatwayward wrote:i'm in the same boat as OP, and i am unfortunately coming to the conclusion that the harder (and for me, first) LG was the real one. FML

Why do yall think the harder one was real?

People can confirm based on other ppl who didnt have two LGs

bc people on other threads have been saying they don't remember bouquets but they do remember juicers....

also, i don't think the real one was that much harder but bc it was first it was hard for me to concentrate bc i was really nervous.

somewhatwayward wrote:also, i don't think the real one was that much harder but bc it was first it was hard for me to concentrate bc i was really nervous.

I don't think I got killed by the real games...but the experimental section was so much easier it makes me nervous.

gbn wrote:People can confirm based on other ppl who didnt have two LGs

So you confirmed this with others who have taken the test through specific questions?

*

are we sure that the test had 100 total? can anyone who had a non LR section for experimental shed light on this?

I thought that the LG and Arguments were really easy. I had trouble with the RC though. Hopefully that didn't screw me up too badly....

Sorry for my ignorance, but what does -14 mean for the curve? Does that mean you can get 14 wrong for a 170?

i had two RCs...
RC-LG-LC-RC-LC-essay

im guessing the first section of the RC was the dummy?

What were some of the other games in the real LG section? I know we had Zulla and the juicers. Trying to remember the others so I can remember how I think I did on them. Just reminder of the general topic will do...especially trying to remember the first game, which I did last and had to guess for three q's bc of time.

somewhatwayward wrote:also, i don't think the real one was that much harder but bc it was first it was hard for me to concentrate bc i was really nervous.

This is the reason I had to retake the test. I got lucky this time and my first section was exp.

JenRUs wrote:I thought that the LG and Arguments were really easy. I had trouble with the RC though. Hopefully that didn't screw me up too badly....

Sorry for my ignorance, but what does -14 mean for the curve? Does that mean you can get 14 wrong for a 170?

Yes

*

for those who had two RCs
from the kids who had only one RC i found out:

RC(dummy)-LG-LC-RC(real)-LC

My 3rd section had a game about hiking, about workers for Friday and Saturday Night... and I forget.

*

What was the hiking game about again?

idkmybffjill wrote:What was the hiking game about again?

Trails.