Taking a PT one section at a time
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 6:14 pm
How legitimate do you consider scores from a PT you took one section at a time? I ask because I scored two points above my highest PT on PT58, and I do think I've progressed enough to justify the improvement, but it was my last PT I had and the test is Saturday, so I don't have anything to verify that. Obviously each section was timed, but when I sat down to take the test originally, something came up, and I've been busy since, so I've done one section a day.
I took the December test and endurance wasn't a problem. My last section was my strongest (though order was also a factor in that). But I also haven't taken a full PT since then -- I went through the LGB, most of the RCB, and took sections and sections worth of PTs, but I didn't have any PTs left in the 50s or high 40s to take other than 58. I've been doing much better on the individual sections than ever before, but I'd obviously more confident in these results if they came in the context of full PTs.
Thoughts?
I took the December test and endurance wasn't a problem. My last section was my strongest (though order was also a factor in that). But I also haven't taken a full PT since then -- I went through the LGB, most of the RCB, and took sections and sections worth of PTs, but I didn't have any PTs left in the 50s or high 40s to take other than 58. I've been doing much better on the individual sections than ever before, but I'd obviously more confident in these results if they came in the context of full PTs.
Thoughts?