Top Law Schools

If i score a -0 on LG i'm always 172+, otherwise i could go as low as 166.

I've screwed up all of my LSAT's because of LG... i mean i bomb that sucker sometimes cause of nerves. i'm taking my last LSAT this feb. and in order to not make the same mistakes, i've made 3 copies of a copy xpress made wired book containing EVERY single LG ever from PT 1 (yeah, i have 1-6 too). I did all of them at least once, systematically getting rid of easy ones.

I only keep the interesting/hard ones which came down to approx. 48-50 games. And i made 3 books off of that which is what i'm currently working on. I don't make any stupid mistakes anymore that's for sure.

My point is this: After having done all of that and becoming a Super-Saiyan 3 LG master, i just bought 59.

Is it just me or did i study to fight Majin Buu, but King Pilaf shows up instead and with a -15 curve? Granted, i didn't do the rest of the test, but my RC's pretty damn good (-1 on PT 57 and worst is -3,-4 even in the modern tests), and my LR's pretty solid too (-3 to -5 worst).

Sorry for all the dragonball z references... it's just the most poetically accurate way of illustrating how i feel. And I'm literally running on about 10 hours of sleep in the past 4 days doing and ungodly amount of LG, so i'm slightly desensitized to everything and mumbling. mwapowierjoaehpaoejr

LG is way easy on this PT.
LR is way way way super hard.

HTH.

Actually, I had problems with number 10. Definitely befuddled me, coulda solved it with like 30 extra seconds but the shear randomness of the question was a bitch. Only question I got wrong on that section, but its still harder than the most recent logic games I think.

The LR I think was a tad harder than normal, nor did the difficulty on the LC go down.

keg411 wrote:LG is way easy on this PT.
LR is way way way super hard.

HTH.

Thank god! When I bombed LR on PT59 - I thought I just got super dumb, thankfully, it wasn't just me.

the LG on PT59 weren't too bad, although I made a REALLY silly mistake.

Seriously??? Wow, I had been getting -1, -0, and one fluke -6 (at 11pm after a long day) on the PTs 50-58. However, despite doing well on the rest of the test and not feeling abnormally tired, I got destroyed on Logic Games and didn't finish, leaving 4 blank and missing 1 that I answered.

Any explanations? I got really thrown off by the last game with the L/V_ _ V/L and T/M_ _ M/T. Can someone explain the inferences that make that one easy? Thanks.

whitman wrote:Seriously??? Wow, I had been getting -1, -0, and one fluke -6 (at 11pm after a long day) on the PTs 50-58. However, despite doing well on the rest of the test and not feeling abnormally tired, I got destroyed on Logic Games and didn't finish, leaving 4 blank and missing 1 that I answered.

Any explanations? I got really thrown off by the last game with the L/V_ _ V/L and T/M_ _ M/T. Can someone explain the inferences that make that one easy? Thanks.

You'll probably hate me at the end of this story, but I agree about that game. First 3 games were pretty easy, fourth...not so much. I didn't leave enough time (usually finished with 2-3 mins to spare in LG on my PTs) and scrambled to pencil in semi-educated guesses on the last 4 of the 4th game.

Then I became elated when I saw another LG section for my experimental, was positive I -0'd it, and held out hope that it was real....until I found out otherwise by reading TLS.

Score comes around, and I got 3/4 on my semi-guesses! Only -1 on LG. That plus the -14 curve made me a happy camper.