Top Law Schools

First question of game two asks what is the maximum number of sessions attended by 'at least one employee'

Does anyone else think it is awkward the way this question is phrased for the game? I mean ALL the employees have to attend 2 meetings. Is this a little psychological trick used by LSAC, because I don't see the logical purpose of phrasing it like this.

Yeah, it is tricky. From your post, I'm not sure if you read it correctly, so in case you got fooled: it's possible for a session to have several people attend a session, leaving some sessions unattended (at least by M S and T). So, the question is asking you to "spread out" their attendance so that as many sessions are attended as possible. If you didn't need that explanation, sorry.

Here's a diagram and explanation for that game: http://www.atlaslsat.com/forums/prep-te ... -t277.html

Have fun.