June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply

WHATS THE FUCKING CURVE

-11
21
21%
wats a curve
8
8%
-10
5
5%
-11
16
16%
-15
4
4%
-7
6
6%
JOSÉ CURVE-O
33
33%
-12
8
8%
 
Total votes: 101

User avatar
R. Jeeves

Gold
Posts: 1980
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by R. Jeeves » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:58 am

TheMikey wrote:
Mr. Meeseeks wrote: Courtesy of the Indy 500 Snakepit
This guy is the real deal. PWing as soon as he walked through the TLS door!
Star spangled hammered. I like it.

User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by pretzeltime » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:59 am

forum_user wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Still calling all women lurkers to de-lurk........

On that note, anyone have thoughts on mixing navy and black in a formal professional setting? Navy dress, black shoes????????? Still a faux pas? Still something I should care about?

ANY THOUGHTS, FELLAS?
In all serious I would never be caught dead mixing a navy and black shoes
Hmm yeah I think it might be worse when it's navy pants/black shoes.......navy dress and black shoes at least has some leg in the middle?

Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8046
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Mikey » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:00 am

forum_user wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Still calling all women lurkers to de-lurk........

On that note, anyone have thoughts on mixing navy and black in a formal professional setting? Navy dress, black shoes????????? Still a faux pas? Still something I should care about?

ANY THOUGHTS, FELLAS?
pw

ETA this response is probably exactly why so few women de-lurk womp
Probably :/ But people need to realize that this is a friendly place and there's no negative judging here ;) 8)

carasrook

Bronze
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:00 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by carasrook » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:01 am

pretzeltime wrote:
forum_user wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Still calling all women lurkers to de-lurk........

On that note, anyone have thoughts on mixing navy and black in a formal professional setting? Navy dress, black shoes????????? Still a faux pas? Still something I should care about?

ANY THOUGHTS, FELLAS?
pw

Ugh I don't have the dumb dress on yet, waiting until later to put it on. So PISSED that I had to spend actual money at Ann Taylor to get an appropriately bland modest and lawyerly outfit.

On the bright side I am probs meeting DEAN STRANG tonight so I must find a way to look as alluring and yet professional as possible

Image
okay two things 1) i mix navy and black all the time and though i wouldn't say it's the best looking choice, i think it's perfectly acceptable (i often wear a navy dress with a black cardigan and black shoes) 2) HOW ARE YOU MEETING DEAN STRANG????? i saw dean and jerry buting live on their tour (lol) but was way up in the nosebleeds

Hennessy

Gold
Posts: 2516
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Hennessy » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:01 am

forum_user wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Still calling all women lurkers to de-lurk........

On that note, anyone have thoughts on mixing navy and black in a formal professional setting? Navy dress, black shoes????????? Still a faux pas? Still something I should care about?

ANY THOUGHTS, FELLAS?
pw

ETA this response is probably exactly why so few women de-lurk womp
no, navy and black is a legitimate style choice, and I think they look fantastic together

it's not 1991 anymore

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


BrownieD

New
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 11:17 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by BrownieD » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:02 am

pretzeltime wrote:Still calling all women lurkers to de-lurk........

On that note, anyone have thoughts on mixing navy and black in a formal professional setting? Navy dress, black shoes????????? Still a faux pas? Still something I should care about?

ANY THOUGHTS, FELLAS?
Hi pretzeltime! Take a look at Princess Kate's engagement photo--navy dress and black shoes. Royalty can't afford to have a faux pas! Dark brown and black, however... that's tougher. Wouldn't recommend that combo, even though I usually disregard fashion rules...

User avatar
R. Jeeves

Gold
Posts: 1980
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by R. Jeeves » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:04 am

ponderingmeerkat wrote:Who is Mr. Meeseeks?
Outed as old

User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by pretzeltime » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:05 am

OMG thanks cara henny and brownie!

That was helpful. And I just googled it and yes according to the internet it's okay now.

Normally IDGAF about such things but I am starting to attend these dumb legal functions and I don't know how to dress for them. Eek

Deanie is speaking at a crim defense awards dinner that I'm going to tonight! He's the keynote speaker.

Please don't quote, for good measure.

User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by pretzeltime » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:05 am

BrownieD wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Still calling all women lurkers to de-lurk........

On that note, anyone have thoughts on mixing navy and black in a formal professional setting? Navy dress, black shoes????????? Still a faux pas? Still something I should care about?

ANY THOUGHTS, FELLAS?
Hi pretzeltime! Take a look at Princess Kate's engagement photo--navy dress and black shoes. Royalty can't afford to have a faux pas! Dark brown and black, however... that's tougher. Wouldn't recommend that combo, even though I usually disregard fashion rules...
POST ITT MORE PLS <3

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
forum_user

Silver
Posts: 844
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by forum_user » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:05 am

TheMikey wrote:
forum_user wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Still calling all women lurkers to de-lurk........

On that note, anyone have thoughts on mixing navy and black in a formal professional setting? Navy dress, black shoes????????? Still a faux pas? Still something I should care about?

ANY THOUGHTS, FELLAS?
pw

ETA this response is probably exactly why so few women de-lurk womp
Probably :/ But people need to realize that this is a friendly place and there's no negative judging here ;) 8)
I mean, as long as you avoid any fashion faux pas :roll:

User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by pretzeltime » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:06 am

R. Jeeves wrote:
ponderingmeerkat wrote:Who is Mr. Meeseeks?
Outed as old
IDK who it is either, should I.......?

User avatar
forum_user

Silver
Posts: 844
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by forum_user » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:06 am

HennessyVSOP wrote:
forum_user wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:Still calling all women lurkers to de-lurk........

On that note, anyone have thoughts on mixing navy and black in a formal professional setting? Navy dress, black shoes????????? Still a faux pas? Still something I should care about?

ANY THOUGHTS, FELLAS?
pw

ETA this response is probably exactly why so few women de-lurk womp
no, navy and black is a legitimate style choice, and I think they look fantastic together

it's not 1991 anymore
UGH

User avatar
R. Jeeves

Gold
Posts: 1980
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by R. Jeeves » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:08 am

Just want to clarify for the lurkers that we're only jokingly vociferous about PWing. They are encouraged but def don't feel pressured. PW or no pw, definitely come and join the shitposting circus.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
meeseeks

Silver
Posts: 530
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:06 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by meeseeks » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:09 am

TheMikey wrote:
Mr. Meeseeks wrote: Courtesy of the Indy 500 Snakepit
This guy is the real deal. PWing as soon as he walked through the TLS door!
Emotionally I've been here for months so it only seemed appropriate. Also let it be known that that is not my standard attire.

ponderingmeerkat

Gold
Posts: 1881
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by ponderingmeerkat » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:10 am

Mr. Meeseeks wrote:
ponderingmeerkat wrote: Excellent post dude...you're fit in here nicely! No requirements with regards to the PW...let your artistic side run wild (reference Henny's PWs as an example if you're into sepia filters and Halloween costumes acceptable only for the french quarter)
Courtesy of the Indy 500 Snakepit
You're setting land speed records around here dude. Well played. 8)
Last edited by ponderingmeerkat on Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
forum_user

Silver
Posts: 844
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by forum_user » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:10 am

R. Jeeves wrote:Just want to clarify for the lurkers that we're only jokingly vociferous about PWing. They are encouraged but def don't feel pressured. PW or no pw, definitely come and join the shitposting circus.
qft

Come shitpost us all the way to 180!!!

ponderingmeerkat

Gold
Posts: 1881
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by ponderingmeerkat » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:12 am

R. Jeeves wrote:Just want to clarify for the lurkers that we're only jokingly vociferous about PWing. They are encouraged but def don't feel pressured. PW or no pw, definitely come and join the shitposting circus.
Cosign. I feel like I, of all people, need to restate this for the record:

I'm really just fucking around. Maintain your anon by all means (hell, my wife did for 3-4 years of poasting). We totally get it.

But yes, this entire clown act we call the waiter's thread would be much improved by everyone's being an idiot together. You do you sis/bro! Cheers.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by pretzeltime » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:15 am

ponderingmeerkat wrote:
R. Jeeves wrote:Just want to clarify for the lurkers that we're only jokingly vociferous about PWing. They are encouraged but def don't feel pressured. PW or no pw, definitely come and join the shitposting circus.
Cosign. I feel like I, of all people, need to restate this for the record:

I'm really just fucking around. Maintain your anon by all means (hell, my wife did for 3-4 years of poasting). We totally get it.

But yes, this entire clown act we call the waiter's thread would be much improved by everyone's being an idiot together. You do you sis/bro! Cheers.
I feel like TT is full of really nice people, which is pretty chill. I've def witnessed some nastier threads 'round here............

It's cool to be nice!

:D :D

ponderingmeerkat

Gold
Posts: 1881
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by ponderingmeerkat » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:19 am

R. Jeeves wrote:
ponderingmeerkat wrote:Who is Mr. Meeseeks?
Outed as old
:lol: Posting while drinking Metamucil and shopping for Doctor Scholls inserts.

User avatar
meeseeks

Silver
Posts: 530
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:06 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by meeseeks » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:20 am

pretzeltime wrote:
I feel like TT is full of really nice people, which is pretty chill. I've def witnessed some nastier threads 'round here............

It's cool to be nice!

:D :D
Second that. The "Things overheard at the LSAT" thread went from funny to arguing real quick.

Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8046
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Mikey » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:22 am

R. Jeeves wrote:Just want to clarify for the lurkers that we're only jokingly vociferous about PWing. They are encouraged but def don't feel pressured. PW or no pw, definitely come and join the shitposting circus.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


ponderingmeerkat

Gold
Posts: 1881
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by ponderingmeerkat » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:22 am

pretzeltime wrote:OMG thanks cara henny and brownie!

That was helpful. And I just googled it and yes according to the internet it's okay now.

Normally IDGAF about such things but I am starting to attend these dumb legal functions and I don't know how to dress for them. Eek

Deanie is speaking at a crim defense awards dinner that I'm going to tonight! He's the keynote speaker.

Please don't quote, for good measure.
BTW, there's a lady's fashion thread in the lounge where all you double-X types can bounce law-specific fashion ideas off the 4Ls and 5Ls (and 8Ls) that hang around. Pretty solid resource.

User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by pretzeltime » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:23 am

ponderingmeerkat wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:OMG thanks cara henny and brownie!

That was helpful. And I just googled it and yes according to the internet it's okay now.

Normally IDGAF about such things but I am starting to attend these dumb legal functions and I don't know how to dress for them. Eek

Deanie is speaking at a crim defense awards dinner that I'm going to tonight! He's the keynote speaker.

Please don't quote, for good measure.
BTW, there's a lady's fashion thread in the lounge where all you double-X types can bounce law-specific fashion ideas off the 4Ls and 5Ls (and 8Ls) that hang around. Pretty solid resource.
oh shit. that's good to know, thanks!

ponderingmeerkat

Gold
Posts: 1881
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by ponderingmeerkat » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:24 am

Mr. Meeseeks wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
I feel like TT is full of really nice people, which is pretty chill. I've def witnessed some nastier threads 'round here............

It's cool to be nice!

:D :D
Second that. The "Things overheard at the LSAT" thread went from funny to arguing real quick.
Yea, the lounge can definitely be toxic especially to the ladies on the board. There was a thread a few months ago where some pretty damning shit came out about people not being excellent to each other.

User avatar
R. Jeeves

Gold
Posts: 1980
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by R. Jeeves » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:25 am

ponderingmeerkat wrote:
Mr. Meeseeks wrote:
pretzeltime wrote:
I feel like TT is full of really nice people, which is pretty chill. I've def witnessed some nastier threads 'round here............

It's cool to be nice!

:D :D
Second that. The "Things overheard at the LSAT" thread went from funny to arguing real quick.
Yea, the lounge can definitely be toxic especially to the ladies on the board. There was a thread a few months ago where some pretty damning shit came out about people not being excellent to each other.
The lounge is brutal. Lot of funny threads to lurk though.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”