Do people with JDs from the US get LLMs?
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:39 am
Are there career paths for which this would be an advantage? Or is it generally for people with foreign law degrees?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=259388
Tax LLMs are a thing for JDs. Regular LLMs -- the program most schools offer for foreign-trained attorneys -- are not.R. Jeeves wrote:Are there career paths for which this would be an advantage? Or is it generally for people with foreign law degrees?
I was looking at Harvard and Columbia's joint JD/LLM programs that they have in conjunction with schools in the UK. Are those only good for something if you're doing tax?Emma. wrote:Tax LLMs are a thing for JDs. Regular LLMs -- the program most schools offer for foreign-trained attorneys -- are not.R. Jeeves wrote:Are there career paths for which this would be an advantage? Or is it generally for people with foreign law degrees?
Not necessarily, but those are somewhat special cases. There probably aren't many situations where an LL.M. from Cambridge or a B.C.L. from Oxford will be strictly necessary for a job, especially if you already have a Harvard or Columbia J.D. It may be advantageous on the margins, such as for prestigious federal government positions (e.g., circuit court clerkships or State Department) or academia, especially if you attended on a Rhodes or Marshall scholarship. But if your goal is BigLaw, then while it probably won't hurt, it won't add much value beyond your J.D. either.R. Jeeves wrote:I was looking at Harvard and Columbia's joint JD/LLM programs that they have in conjunction with schools in the UK. Are those only good for something if you're doing tax?Emma. wrote:Tax LLMs are a thing for JDs. Regular LLMs -- the program most schools offer for foreign-trained attorneys -- are not.R. Jeeves wrote:Are there career paths for which this would be an advantage? Or is it generally for people with foreign law degrees?
gotcha. thanks for the infoAeon wrote:Not necessarily, but those are somewhat special cases. There probably aren't many situations where an LL.M. from Cambridge or a B.C.L. from Oxford will be strictly necessary for a job, especially if you already have a Harvard or Columbia J.D. It may be advantageous on the margins, such as for prestigious federal government positions (e.g., circuit court clerkships or State Department) or academia, especially if you attended on a Rhodes or Marshall scholarship. But if your goal is BigLaw, then while it probably won't hurt, it won't add much value beyond your J.D. either.R. Jeeves wrote:I was looking at Harvard and Columbia's joint JD/LLM programs that they have in conjunction with schools in the UK. Are those only good for something if you're doing tax?Emma. wrote:Tax LLMs are a thing for JDs. Regular LLMs -- the program most schools offer for foreign-trained attorneys -- are not.R. Jeeves wrote:Are there career paths for which this would be an advantage? Or is it generally for people with foreign law degrees?
I had an undergrad prof with a JD and two LLMs, one in health law and one in federal indian law. I was a little surprised when I showed up to law school and realized all the LLM candidates were internationalsR. Jeeves wrote:Are there career paths for which this would be an advantage? Or is it generally for people with foreign law degrees?
Agreed. You can't work in the tax group of my firm without a tax LLM. Literally don't know anyone with any other type.Emma. wrote:Tax LLMs are a thing for JDs. Regular LLMs -- the program most schools offer for foreign-trained attorneys -- are not.R. Jeeves wrote:Are there career paths for which this would be an advantage? Or is it generally for people with foreign law degrees?