What is a not inevitable case?ihenry wrote:I mean the future "they" not current "they". If my statement upsets anyone I apologize. All these are not targeted at current kids or inevitable cases.A. Nony Mouse wrote:For themselves and their families is pretty harsh. I know a number of people with autistic kids/kids with Down syndrome and that kind of statement generally upsets them a lot.
Should I hold my future for my BF?? Forum
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Should I hold my future for my BF??
- ihenry
- Posts: 576
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2015 12:27 am
Re: Should I hold my future for my BF??
Back when I was a kid my dad always gave me some coins upon seeing a beggar, some disabled, holding a broken bowl asking passersby for money, and asked me to go ahead and put the coins in their bowls. So now I have compassion for really unfortunate ones and I have a remote sense of how hard life can be. But later... there were "professional" beggars who earn more than an average white collar and changes new iPhone every year. That was China. I also heard some people from other cultures who choose to be scavengers because life is freer, and they have no intention of accumulating wealth and just want something to stuff stomach. So things can really vary dramatically by person.AReasonableMan wrote: I prefer fewer homeless people on the subway for society. Last night I was sandwiched in by one gentleman not wearing shoes or socks and one with no pants. I was dosing off, and the smell gave me an energy drink type punch.
- ihenry
- Posts: 576
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2015 12:27 am
Re: Should I hold my future for my BF??
You guess.A. Nony Mouse wrote:What is a not inevitable case?ihenry wrote:I mean the future "they" not current "they". If my statement upsets anyone I apologize. All these are not targeted at current kids or inevitable cases.A. Nony Mouse wrote:For themselves and their families is pretty harsh. I know a number of people with autistic kids/kids with Down syndrome and that kind of statement generally upsets them a lot.
-
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Should I hold my future for my BF??
Schizophrenia and crack cocaine tend to pack a big 1-2 punch.ihenry wrote:Back when I was a kid my dad always gave me some coins upon seeing a beggar, some disabled, holding a broken bowl asking passersby for money, and asked me to go ahead and put the coins in their bowls. So now I have compassion for really unfortunate ones and I have a remote sense of how hard life can be. But later... there were "professional" beggars who earn more than an average white collar and changes new iPhone every year. That was China. I also heard some people from other cultures who choose to be scavengers because life is freer, and they have no intention of accumulating wealth and just want something to stuff stomach. So things can really vary dramatically by person.AReasonableMan wrote: I prefer fewer homeless people on the subway for society. Last night I was sandwiched in by one gentleman not wearing shoes or socks and one with no pants. I was dosing off, and the smell gave me an energy drink type punch.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Should I hold my future for my BF??
It sounds kinda like you're blaming older parents for their kids' status, but that would be pretty rude, so...ihenry wrote:You guess.A. Nony Mouse wrote:What is a not inevitable case?ihenry wrote:I mean the future "they" not current "they". If my statement upsets anyone I apologize. All these are not targeted at current kids or inevitable cases.A. Nony Mouse wrote:For themselves and their families is pretty harsh. I know a number of people with autistic kids/kids with Down syndrome and that kind of statement generally upsets them a lot.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- PoopyPants
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 11:55 am
Re: Should I hold my future for my BF??
I wouldn't ponder it too much. In the largest study ever done on parental age and ASD risk, there is only a statistically significant increase in relative risk when the father reaches age 50.haus wrote:As an older father myself, my wife became pregnant when I was 36, it is possible that this played a role in my child having autism. Although, it is not reasonably possible to draw a direct connection, it is something that I ponder from time to time. I love my daughter, and although I wish life were easier for her, I would not for one moment consider her not being in my life because of this challenge.AReasonableMan wrote:Maybe they should.emkay625 wrote:What gets me is older fathers (also starting at the age of 35 for many medical problems) also present medical risks to offspring (including an increased risk of autism and schizophrenia, cleft palate, low birth weight, certain types of cancer, and a whole lot more) but no one spends their time wringing their hands and counseling 27-year-old fathers that they better delay their career and have a baby now so their baby won't have X condition.
http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/vaop/n ... 1570a.html
ETA: they also looked at maternal age (lowest risk is actually just after 30), and joint ages.
-
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Should I hold my future for my BF??
I mean sperm does get weaker as men age so waiting till 50 wouldn't necessarily have such great odds of getting a woman pregnant in the first place.PoopyPants wrote:I wouldn't ponder it too much. In the largest study ever done on parental age and ASD risk, there is only a statistically significant increase in relative risk when the father reaches age 50.haus wrote:As an older father myself, my wife became pregnant when I was 36, it is possible that this played a role in my child having autism. Although, it is not reasonably possible to draw a direct connection, it is something that I ponder from time to time. I love my daughter, and although I wish life were easier for her, I would not for one moment consider her not being in my life because of this challenge.AReasonableMan wrote:Maybe they should.emkay625 wrote:What gets me is older fathers (also starting at the age of 35 for many medical problems) also present medical risks to offspring (including an increased risk of autism and schizophrenia, cleft palate, low birth weight, certain types of cancer, and a whole lot more) but no one spends their time wringing their hands and counseling 27-year-old fathers that they better delay their career and have a baby now so their baby won't have X condition.
http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/vaop/n ... 1570a.html
ETA: they also looked at maternal age (lowest risk is actually just after 30), and joint ages.