philosophy/legal reasoning v. black letter law
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 8:15 am
in other threads, people say to focus on rules, black letter law
looking at practice exams i can see why
i have a q about this
at the urging of profs, i've been spending a lot of time thinking about legal reasoning, philosophy, history, etc
i'm wondering if all (or at least some) of the time i'm spending doing that would be better spent reading commercial outlines, learning the modern rules, playing with hypos, etc
for example, in civ pro we're starting with personal jurisdiction
so i'm spending a super long time thinking about decisions that don't reflect modern law
and i get the value in that and all
but in addition to that, should i start learning modern black letter law from emanuels/e&es or something
seems like that would fast forward the process
looking at practice exams i can see why
i have a q about this
at the urging of profs, i've been spending a lot of time thinking about legal reasoning, philosophy, history, etc
i'm wondering if all (or at least some) of the time i'm spending doing that would be better spent reading commercial outlines, learning the modern rules, playing with hypos, etc
for example, in civ pro we're starting with personal jurisdiction
so i'm spending a super long time thinking about decisions that don't reflect modern law
and i get the value in that and all
but in addition to that, should i start learning modern black letter law from emanuels/e&es or something
seems like that would fast forward the process