.
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 12:51 pm
.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=191389
i tried to take notes on case during pre-class reading but quickly found it to be useless. just cluttered up my much more valuable in-class notes.ilovelawtays wrote:If you're cutting and pasting briefs off the internet, you're not doing it right. If you're just copying stuff down, you're not doing it right either.
You're paying a lot of money and spending a lot of time to learn this stuff. Read the squibs and note cases, write out a few sentences or paragraph or whatever with the holding and how it relates to the primary case, and then see what your prof says. You'll figure it out. No one knows what the hell is going on the first few weeks, anyway.
At the very least, OP needs to read what's been assigned. If he finds it useless to take notes on squibs, that's fine, but it won't do him any good to just paste something into his briefs or notes on the off chance he gets cold called. Those cases are a half page at the most, so there's no reason not to spend 10 minutes reading and understanding them.fatduck wrote:i tried to take notes on case during pre-class reading but quickly found it to be useless. just cluttered up my much more valuable in-class notes.ilovelawtays wrote:If you're cutting and pasting briefs off the internet, you're not doing it right. If you're just copying stuff down, you're not doing it right either.
You're paying a lot of money and spending a lot of time to learn this stuff. Read the squibs and note cases, write out a few sentences or paragraph or whatever with the holding and how it relates to the primary case, and then see what your prof says. You'll figure it out. No one knows what the hell is going on the first few weeks, anyway.
internet case briefs are fine for having some shit to say for a cold call, but that's all i used them for.
sorry i was talking about cases in general not just squibs, which probably wasn't clear. anyway, yea, you should probably read all the assignments. i'm just saying it's not really necessary to take notes before class or brief or whatever (which is kind of common knowledge on tls i think?). but if you have a prof who asks lame, specific questions on cold calls, then sometimes canned briefs can be useful cause they usually have a pretty detailed explanation of the bullshit like procedural history and facts.ilovelawtays wrote:At the very least, OP needs to read what's been assigned. If he finds it useless to take notes on squibs, that's fine, but it won't do him any good to just paste something into his briefs or notes on the off chance he gets cold called. Those cases are a half page at the most, so there's no reason not to spend 10 minutes reading and understanding them.fatduck wrote:i tried to take notes on case during pre-class reading but quickly found it to be useless. just cluttered up my much more valuable in-class notes.ilovelawtays wrote:If you're cutting and pasting briefs off the internet, you're not doing it right. If you're just copying stuff down, you're not doing it right either.
You're paying a lot of money and spending a lot of time to learn this stuff. Read the squibs and note cases, write out a few sentences or paragraph or whatever with the holding and how it relates to the primary case, and then see what your prof says. You'll figure it out. No one knows what the hell is going on the first few weeks, anyway.
internet case briefs are fine for having some shit to say for a cold call, but that's all i used them for.
Reading > C & P, always.
TITCR for me. If a professor spends time on the note cases in class then I'll read them; if not, I generally just skim. It largely depends though. For example: my con law professor discussed note cases but I didn't read them and used the Chemerinsky supplement to cover that material in a more succinct fashion. Totally a judgement call IMO.TIKITEMBO wrote:Yes, I know it will depend on the professor