Top Law Schools

We all know that in undergrad we can read professor reviews before we sign up for classes and make it so that we give ourselves the most favorable chances of maintaining a high GPA. Can you do the same thing in law school to try and stay as high up in the class rankings as possible?

PBateman1 wrote:We all know that in undergrad we can read professor reviews before we sign up for classes and make it so that we give ourselves the most favorable chances of maintaining a high GPA. Can you do the same thing in law school to try and stay as high up in the class rankings as possible?

Not your 1L year.

At my school we have two open electives during 1L spring semester. Not all of the electives open to 1Ls have to be curved. So the answer is, yes in some instances.

This is interesting. And very true about UG. With any intellect, research before hand, and some effort a 3.9+ is easy

Veyron wrote:

PBateman1 wrote:We all know that in undergrad we can read professor reviews before we sign up for classes and make it so that we give ourselves the most favorable chances of maintaining a high GPA. Can you do the same thing in law school to try and stay as high up in the class rankings as possible?

Not your 1L year.

Not only that, OCI is basically all about 1L grades. So, for when it most matters, no you cannot.

vanwinkle wrote:

Veyron wrote:

PBateman1 wrote:We all know that in undergrad we can read professor reviews before we sign up for classes and make it so that we give ourselves the most favorable chances of maintaining a high GPA. Can you do the same thing in law school to try and stay as high up in the class rankings as possible?

Not your 1L year.

Not only that, OCI is basically all about 1L grades. So, for when it most matters, no you cannot.

Right.

You can totally game your law school GPA after it doesn't matter anymore.

Take Islamic Law.

Clinics, seminars, externships, random classes with low enrollment and professors that mail it in. However, if you're on a clerkship track you kind of have to stay on point at least through two years.

At UVA you can access prior grade distributions, so it's possible to take some classes that are heavy on the B+ and put in a subpar effort.

Renzo wrote:

vanwinkle wrote:

Veyron wrote:

PBateman1 wrote:We all know that in undergrad we can read professor reviews before we sign up for classes and make it so that we give ourselves the most favorable chances of maintaining a high GPA. Can you do the same thing in law school to try and stay as high up in the class rankings as possible?

Not your 1L year.

Not only that, OCI is basically all about 1L grades. So, for when it most matters, no you cannot.

Right.

You can totally game your law school GPA after it doesn't matter anymore.

0L here, so I admittedly know nothing, but is this really fair? I would think law firms would look favorably on an upward trend...

Fairness. Lol.

InGoodFaith wrote:0L here, so I admittedly know nothing, but is this really fair? I would think law firms would look favorably on an upward trend...

dailygrind wrote:Fairness. Lol.

+1

vanwinkle wrote:

InGoodFaith wrote:0L here, so I admittedly know nothing, but is this really fair? I would think law firms would look favorably on an upward trend...

dailygrind wrote:Fairness. Lol.

+1

This is just a general comment, but I think a big problem 0Ls have going into law school is this belief that the legal profession will be "understanding" or "fair" or "considerate" in the same way their undergrad profs have been toward them. They're not.

Undergrad profs are paid whether you pass or not, and in fact get in trouble if they fail too many of you because colleges want to keep students enrolled and keep collecting tuition. (This is also largely true in law school, where the curve is set up to keep you from failing, even if you end up with grades that make you unemployable.) So it's easy to think of life being "fair" or "understanding" for a while.

Law firm partners, on the other hand, share profits from the law firm, which means that they get paid based on how efficiently and quickly the law firm gets work done. If you're too slow, or prone to mistakes, you could ultimately cost them clients and therefore money, so they will push you out the door before that happens. This is one reason why they emphasize 1L grades so much; they want to pick a bunch of potentially solid students, and then have a summer with them as a preview of their on-the-job ability before deciding to hire them permanently. You won't have all your 2L grades back until after the 2L summer has begun, and it'll be too late for them to hire you for a summer then.

Is that "fair" to students who do poorly in 1L but bring their grades up? Not really. But they have no interest in that kind of "fairness". Most firms are "fair" to the students they offer summer positions to, giving them priority for permanent hiring as long as they perform well and don't embarrass the firm. That is fair to those students, since they work there for the summer expecting to earn a job offer, but this blocks out people who couldn't get in through OCI.

To be clear, I meant "fair" in the sense of whether the COMMENT was fair (that GPA doesn't matter after 1L), not that the system was fair. Sorry for the confusion.

InGoodFaith wrote:To be clear, I meant "fair" in the sense of whether the COMMENT was fair (that GPA doesn't matter after 1L), not that the system was fair. Sorry for the confusion.

The problem is that people whose opinion about your grades matter most will only ever see them once, and that's before you start your 2L year. After that, you've missed the OCI boat, and it's not coming back. Missing OCI is itself a black mark of sorts with certain employers. If you fucking destroyed it, and got perfect grades 2L year, there might be a slim prayer one of those employers would consider you, but it will be much harder to even get them to notice your application and look at your (now really good) grades.

Law firms: OCI is basically end-game and they only see your 1L grades which you cannot game. But:

Renzo wrote:If you fucking destroyed it, and got perfect grades 2L year, there might be a slim prayer one of those employers would consider you, but it will be much harder to even get them to notice your application and look at your (now really good) grades

Clerkships: Judges see your transcript, know if you tried to game the system, and take this into consideration when seeing your GPA.

Government: I'll defer to others on this but from what I gather grades are not as important for government employers as they mainly focus on your practical experience. The problem is that they rarely hire straight out of law school (especially now) and you're forced to take another path to get there (see above categories).

PI: no idea but my guess would be that their criteria mirrors that of government (see above)

quiver wrote:Law firms: OCI is basically end-game and they only see your 1L grades which you cannot game. But:

Renzo wrote:If you fucking destroyed it, and got perfect grades 2L year, there might be a slim prayer one of those employers would consider you, but it will be much harder to even get them to notice your application and look at your (now really good) grades

Clerkships: Judges see your transcript, know if you tried to game the system, and take this into consideration when seeing your GPA.

Government: I'll defer to others on this but from what I gather grades are not as important for government employers as they mainly focus on your practical experience. The problem is that they rarely hire straight out of law school (especially now) and you're forced to take another path to get there (see above categories).

PI: no idea but my guess would be that their criteria mirrors that of government (see above)

This is mostly true. Judges won't be impressed that you got an A in your Law and Kittens seminar, although some PI orgs might be; and, some Federal employers are actually significantly more sensitive to grades than to school rank. So in general you shouldn't completely blow off your 2/3L years, but the marginal benefit from trying to "game" them is teeny tiny.

InGoodFaith wrote:To be clear, I meant "fair" in the sense of whether the COMMENT was fair (that GPA doesn't matter after 1L), not that the system was fair. Sorry for the confusion.

GPA doesn't matter after 1L if all you want is a biglaw job out of OCI. However, it does matter for a great number of other types of jobs.

Thanks for all of the responses from all perspectives. I think I'm perfectly capable of attaining a good GPA in law school, but you also just always want to look for the extra edge, ya know?

PBateman1 wrote:Thanks for all of the responses from all perspectives. I think I'm perfectly capable of attaining a good GPA in law school , but you also just always want to look for the extra edge, ya know?

LOL good luck

PBateman1 wrote:Thanks for all of the responses from all perspectives. I think I'm perfectly capable of attaining a good GPA in law school, but you also just always want to look for the extra edge, ya know?

What is this I don't even

PBateman1 wrote:Thanks for all of the responses from all perspectives. I think I'm perfectly capable of attaining a good GPA in law school, but you also just always want to look for the extra edge, ya know?

Let's shoot for the 4.0, mayne!

ToTransferOrNot wrote:

PBateman1 wrote:Thanks for all of the responses from all perspectives. I think I'm perfectly capable of attaining a good GPA in law school, but you also just always want to look for the extra edge, ya know?

What is this I don't even

Improper use of meme

PBateman1 wrote:

ToTransferOrNot wrote:

PBateman1 wrote:Thanks for all of the responses from all perspectives. I think I'm perfectly capable of attaining a good GPA in law school, but you also just always want to look for the extra edge, ya know?

What is this I don't even

Improper use of meme

Milhouse is not a meme.