If you need sports prestige for something to talk about you're probably not that interesting or memorable, imolisjjen wrote:These things obviously don't do the work for you. Obviously. But lay prestige gives you an edge. I was just wondering if sports prestige would make you more interesting, give you something to talk about, make you more memorable. Something along those lines.
Lay prestige vs sports prestige Forum
- dr123
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
- usuaggie
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:43 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
i've talked to lawyers who had assumed oregon was ranked higher than it is just because they heard so much about the school during the football season.
- beachbum
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
I dunno guys, I think sports prestige is more than enough to make one school better than another.
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
The country is talking about Stanford football quite a bit.dr123 wrote:If you need sports prestige for something to talk about you're probably not that interesting or memorable, imolisjjen wrote:These things obviously don't do the work for you. Obviously. But lay prestige gives you an edge. I was just wondering if sports prestige would make you more interesting, give you something to talk about, make you more memorable. Something along those lines.
ETA women's bball.
- lisjjen
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:19 am
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
Missing the point. Just. Missing the point.dr123 wrote:If you need sports prestige for something to talk about you're probably not that interesting or memorable, imolisjjen wrote:These things obviously don't do the work for you. Obviously. But lay prestige gives you an edge. I was just wondering if sports prestige would make you more interesting, give you something to talk about, make you more memorable. Something along those lines.
This logic = Formula 1 cars must not perform very well because their drivers want to tune their engines and put carbon fiber performance kits on them.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 757
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
I actually think sports prestige does have some impact on schools' general lay prestige. Of course undergrad prestige has little to do with law school prestige, and lay prestige is all but irrelavant to securing gainful employment...That being said, take for example Notre Dame and/or Duke; the general public is highly aware of these schools' acadmeic excellence. Why? because the people on TV are constantly talking about how impressive it is that they are able to compete on the level that they do (not so much Notre Dame football anymore) while maintaining high standards of academic excellence. Meanwhile, schools like Vanderbilt, UVA, W&M, and many others do not perform well enough in sports to really be a topic of discussion on TV. So, the general public outside of their close geographic proximity has no idea that they are strong academic institutions. Here in Phoenix, I would say that the majority of people think of UVA as pretty much equivelant to ASU.
- cmraider
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 9:13 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
Let's imagine for a minute that USNWR ranked college sports programs. Just in the same way they rank medical, business and law schools, assume they treated college sports like a professional program with factors such as tradition, NFL/NBA placement, quality of coaching staff, on-field performance, etc. serving as the metrics. If you consider the only sports which most people care about (football, men's basketball and, to a lesser extent, women's basketball), who would be the T14 of college sports?Fred_McGriff wrote:
T12
Edit: Forgot NFL wasn't the only pro sports league
Last edited by cmraider on Mon Feb 14, 2011 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- cmraider
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 9:13 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
My T14 would be, in no particular order:
1. Texas
2. Florida
3. USC
4. Ohio St
5. Oklahoma
6. Alabama
7. LSU
8. Virginia Tech
9. Wisconsin
10. Auburn
11. Pittsburgh
12. Miami
13. UNC
14. Michigan
Just missed:
Oregon, Miami, Florida St, Kansas, Duke, BYU
1. Texas
2. Florida
3. USC
4. Ohio St
5. Oklahoma
6. Alabama
7. LSU
8. Virginia Tech
9. Wisconsin
10. Auburn
11. Pittsburgh
12. Miami
13. UNC
14. Michigan
Just missed:
Oregon, Miami, Florida St, Kansas, Duke, BYU
- Flips88
- Posts: 15246
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
Not going to rank in order but Oklahoma, Texas, 'Bama, Florida, USC, LSU, Ohio State (primarily football schools with some basketball crossover ) Duke, North Carolina, UCLA, Kansas (primarily Basketball powerhouses). So that's 11. Maybe Notre Dame and Michigan (even though they've sucked as of late in football). Then I don't know Standford? Wisconsin? Miami?cmraider wrote: Let's imagine for a minute that USNWR ranked college sports programs. Just in the same way they rank medical, business and law schools, assume they treated college sports like a professional program with factors such as tradition, NFL placement, quality of coaching staff, on-field performance, etc. serving as the metrics. If you consider the only sports which most people care about (football, men's basketball and, to a lesser extent, women's basketball), who would be the T14 of college sports?
so in no particular order
1.OU
2. Texas
3. Bama
4. Florida
5. USC
6. LSU
7. Ohio State
8. Duke
9. North Carolina
10. UCLA
11. Kansas
12. Notre Dame
13. Michigan
14. Wisconsin/Stanford/Miami
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
"Cornell Commencement address? Sorry but Tracy Jordan doesn't do safety schools." - Tracy Jordan
- Flips88
- Posts: 15246
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
Duke and Kansas' basketball prowess >>>>>>anything going on at Pitt or Va Techcmraider wrote:My T14 would be, in no particular order:
1. Texas
2. Florida
3. USC
4. Ohio St
5. Oklahoma
6. Alabama
7. LSU
8. Virginia Tech
9. Wisconsin
10. Auburn
11. Pittsburgh
12. Miami
13. UNC
14. Michigan
Just missed:
Oregon, Miami, Florida St, Kansas, Duke, BYU
- tallboone
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 12:27 am
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
Sorry, but you can't leave UCLA out of this. Most NCAA championships of any college sports program, most NCCAB titles, and they used to be good a football consistently until this millenium.
t-14 in no order:
t-14 College Sports
UCLA
USC
Ohio State
Michigan
Florida
Florida St.
LSU
Texas
Oklahoma
Notre Dame
Duke
North Carolina
University of Miami
Kansas
t-14 in no order:
t-14 College Sports
UCLA
USC
Ohio State
Michigan
Florida
Florida St.
LSU
Texas
Oklahoma
Notre Dame
Duke
North Carolina
University of Miami
Kansas
- cmraider
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 9:13 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
I guess it just depends on how much weight you put in each sport. I followed the line of reasoning that Pitt is usually at the top of their conference in football and basketball, with their Bball program perennially in the top-10 nationally. Va Tech is a top-10 fball team most years and the bball team is a 20-win squad most years. Also, I put a little more stock in fball than men's bball, just because fball>bball in $$$ and popularity. But I concede it's a debatable list. How much does Kansas' and Duke's top-5 bball programs make up for their typically-last-in-conference fball programs?Flips88 wrote:Duke and Kansas' basketball prowess >>>>>>anything going on at Pitt or Va Techcmraider wrote:My T14 would be, in no particular order:
1. Texas
2. Florida
3. USC
4. Ohio St
5. Oklahoma
6. Alabama
7. LSU
8. Virginia Tech
9. Wisconsin
10. Auburn
11. Pittsburgh
12. Miami
13. UNC
14. Michigan
Just missed:
Oregon, Miami, Florida St, Kansas, Duke, BYU
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 757
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
Does their program get dinged for athlete time in prison and/or arrests? then VaTech would definitely be out of the t20.cmraider wrote:Let's imagine for a minute that USNWR ranked college sports programs. Just in the same way they rank medical, business and law schools, assume they treated college sports like a professional program with factors such as tradition, NFL/NBA placement, quality of coaching staff, on-field performance, etc. serving as the metrics. If you consider the only sports which most people care about (football, men's basketball and, to a lesser extent, women's basketball), who would be the T14 of college sports?Fred_McGriff wrote:
T12
Edit: Forgot NFL wasn't the only pro sports league
- Flips88
- Posts: 15246
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
At OU, in 2008, we had the Heisman winner and the men's and women's basketball players of the year (Blake Griffin and Courtney Paris). Griffin and Bradford were both #1 draft picks. Sam already received the Offensive Rookie of the Year and Blake is already on the All-Star team and will surely win Rookie of the Year. I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'
Oh and we were the first school to have 3 of the top 4 NFL draft picks.
ETA: Pitt Football top of their conference. Big East, lolz. They haven't had a memorable player since Larry Fitzgerald.
Oh and we were the first school to have 3 of the top 4 NFL draft picks.
ETA: Pitt Football top of their conference. Big East, lolz. They haven't had a memorable player since Larry Fitzgerald.
- cmraider
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 9:13 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
LeSean McCoy and Darrelle Revis might take offense to this.Flips88 wrote: ETA: Pitt Football top of their conference. Big East, lolz. They haven't had a memorable player since Larry Fitzgerald.
- Flips88
- Posts: 15246
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
Who?cmraider wrote:LeSean McCoy and Darrelle Revis might take offense to this.Flips88 wrote: ETA: Pitt Football top of their conference. Big East, lolz. They haven't had a memorable player since Larry Fitzgerald.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
Westbrook+Flips88 wrote:Who?cmraider wrote:LeSean McCoy and Darrelle Revis might take offense to this.Flips88 wrote: ETA: Pitt Football top of their conference. Big East, lolz. They haven't had a memorable player since Larry Fitzgerald.
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:16 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
Sports prestige can definitely take a school to another level...I present the "Flutie effect" at Boston College. Before Flutie's Hail Mary and Heisman BC was little more than a commuter school with little to no reputation...In 25 years it has become and International institution with a Top 30 undergrad program a Top 30 Law School and many other highly regarded graduate schools....Sports can definitely help in bringing a school's lay prestige up
- Flips88
- Posts: 15246
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
There's no way you can attribute this to football.jamie9248922 wrote:Sports prestige can definitely take a school to another level...I present the "Flutie effect" at Boston College. Before Flutie's Hail Mary and Heisman BC was little more than a commuter school with little to no reputation...In 25 years it has become and International institution with a Top 30 undergrad program a Top 30 Law School and many other highly regarded graduate schools....Sports can definitely help in bringing a school's lay prestige up
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:16 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flutie_EffectFlips88 wrote:There's no way you can attribute this to football.jamie9248922 wrote:Sports prestige can definitely take a school to another level...I present the "Flutie effect" at Boston College. Before Flutie's Hail Mary and Heisman BC was little more than a commuter school with little to no reputation...In 25 years it has become and International institution with a Top 30 undergrad program a Top 30 Law School and many other highly regarded graduate schools....Sports can definitely help in bringing a school's lay prestige up
It has been debated...but it was a factor in putting Boston College in many people's minds
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- beachbum
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
There are college sports other than football and men's basketball? Since when?
-
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:41 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
I definitely believe sports prestige plays a factor. I went to Michigan State University which is a good, public university that has a couple of "great programs." The school doesn't have the "prestige" that Michigan has, but when I tell people I went to MSU, they at least know it's a quality school.
Some people think MSU is great, because we are a top tier basketball school and people know our football team because we produce NFL players and play premiere programs like Notre Dame and Michigan. We are also part of the "Big 10," which is known for strong academics and sports programs. If sports prestige didn't play a factor, then it makes no sense that our alumni funding and applications increase to the university when we go to the Final Four or win a National Championship.
Whether I'm applying for jobs in the legal field, consulting, or Target, the hiring manager will know of Michigan State, regardless of whether a certain program is ranked less than Washington University (St. Louis), etc. This is an advantage that sports prestige programs have over those "coveted" universities.
Some people think MSU is great, because we are a top tier basketball school and people know our football team because we produce NFL players and play premiere programs like Notre Dame and Michigan. We are also part of the "Big 10," which is known for strong academics and sports programs. If sports prestige didn't play a factor, then it makes no sense that our alumni funding and applications increase to the university when we go to the Final Four or win a National Championship.
Whether I'm applying for jobs in the legal field, consulting, or Target, the hiring manager will know of Michigan State, regardless of whether a certain program is ranked less than Washington University (St. Louis), etc. This is an advantage that sports prestige programs have over those "coveted" universities.
- blazinswordofjustice
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:52 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
Interesting...i agree though, besides increasing a school's national reputation and image in peoples minds, a good athletic program can bring in a LOT of money for a school, a school like USC/texas/LSU sells a lot of merchandise/tickets/etc...plus increases donations by having a good athletic program...jamie9248922 wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flutie_Effect
It has been debated...but it was a factor in putting Boston College in many people's minds
- Flips88
- Posts: 15246
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm
Re: Lay prestige vs sports prestige
The athletic department is on a separate budget, so revenue stays within that department for the most part. I guess the best hope is that your NFL players donate to the university scholarship fund...blazinswordofjustice wrote:Interesting...i agree though, besides increasing a school's national reputation and image in peoples minds, a good athletic program can bring in a LOT of money for a school, a school like USC/texas/LSU sells a lot of merchandise/tickets/etc...plus increases donations by having a good athletic program...jamie9248922 wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flutie_Effect
It has been debated...but it was a factor in putting Boston College in many people's minds
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login