Page 1 of 1
Grades v. Prestige
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 10:06 pm
by xmrmckenziex
I am sure that this question has been asked before; I just wasn't entirely sure how to phrase a forum search on the specific topic. I was curious at what point, success at a lower ranked school starts to overtake the prestige of a slightly higher ranked school i.e. would top 10% UCLA be more valued by employers over top 25% at NYU or top 50% at Harvard?
Obviously there are tons of factors that employers take into account; I'm just curious how prestige of the institution you were part of rates in relation to how you performed at said institution.
Re: Grades v. Prestige
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 10:11 pm
by nealric
I was curious at what point, success at a lower ranked school starts to overtake the prestige of a slightly higher ranked school i.e. would top 10% UCLA be more valued by employers over top 25% at NYU or top 50% at Harvard?
There is no set point. Different employers value different things. A district court judge in California would more likely to take the person from UCLA. A large firm in NYC would be more likely to take the person from NYU or Harvard.
It's also worth noting that Harvard does not give traditional grades. It's Honors/Pass/Low Pass- so you can't directly compare a Harvard person to a UCLA person.
Re: Grades v. Prestige
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 10:13 pm
by TheFriendlyBarber
xmrmckenziex wrote:I was curious at what point, success at a lower ranked school starts to overtake the prestige of a slightly higher ranked school
Top 1% at HLS > Bottom 1% at YLS
Top 10% at SLS > Bottom 90% at HLS
xmrmckenziex wrote:would top 10% UCLA be more valued by employers over top 25% at NYU or top 50% at Harvard?
No.