This. And I'm not good enough at math for finance.skoobily doobily wrote:I'm going to law school to make as much money as possible. Get off your high horse.
Which is why I'm going to be a tax lawyer.
This. And I'm not good enough at math for finance.skoobily doobily wrote:I'm going to law school to make as much money as possible. Get off your high horse.
I was going to say, hey you can't divide by zero!....ResolutePear wrote:paratactical wrote:Success = (Money + Prestige)^(How many times the lottery was won)/# of Diseases Acquired Whoring Oneself Out to Get there^(# of times struck by lightning)Patriot1208 wrote:In the legal profession doesn't succesful = at least relative wealth?JustBelieve wrote:It's not about becoming rich, but if you mean successful, then the obvious and apparent answer is yes. You can be whatever you set your mind to. You must, however, have the grades!! Get that GPA in the upper echelon of your school and you will be good.
Nothing is more important than your grades.
well...u dont rly need to b good at math to get into finance or b good at it....but w/e, it's too late now. i'll c u in LSmotiontodismiss wrote:This. And I'm not good enough at math for finance.skoobily doobily wrote:I'm going to law school to make as much money as possible. Get off your high horse.
Which is why I'm going to be a tax lawyer.
Plus some pretty amazing softs; waiting on the jr2...but don't worry about me- I'll be fine either wayResolutePear wrote:MysticalWheel wrote:With a 174+3.8? Really?paratactical wrote:Lol...too bad I'm more or less set to make mince meat out of everyone at Harvard next year, so I can understand the bitterness.ResolutePear wrote:
Tugboat could not hold enough douche for that vagina there.
MW
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Sorry, I'm not, and isn't that getting to be a little inappropriate now? What, are you threatened that I'm a woman? Is that why you're resorting to sexual references?ResolutePear wrote:Are you asking me if I want a blowjob?MysticalWheel wrote:Shhhh...isn't it time for your nap?ResolutePear wrote:That's the type of douche you don't want to hold. It's a type you want to tug around 40 feet behind you at all times.paratactical wrote: Tugboat could not hold enough douche for that vagina there.
MW
Shhhh...go write some more sentence fragments- it'll make you feel better. And if Harvard is a rejection, then I guess I'll have to settle for Stanford...awww shucks lol.firemedicprelaw wrote:+1ResolutePear wrote:With a 174+3.8? Really?MysticalWheel wrote: Lol...too bad I'm more or less set to make mince meat out of everyone at Harvard next year, so I can understand the bitterness.
MW
To MW: Chill. Seriously. Obtain prescription for THC or one of the popular benzos for anxiety. Take said prescription. You will like us all a lot more, and will think we are a lot funnier, status-post "high." It will also make your rejection from HYS more palatable, just FYI.
Well, it is. I was going for crude, but mean works too .3|ink wrote:This wasn't trolling. This was just plain mean.MysticalWheel wrote:This poll is flawed...up the ASS (excuse my French).
MW
Can I just ask why you feel the need to type MW at the end of every post? Well I completely understand that it can sometimes be difficult for someone to remember their own initials, you do know your screen name is displayed beside all your posts? Because honestly, the rest of us know where display names are located, so I can only imagine that placing your initials at the end of every post fulfills some need of yours.MysticalWheel wrote:Well, it is. I was going for crude, but mean works too .3|ink wrote:This wasn't trolling. This was just plain mean.MysticalWheel wrote:This poll is flawed...up the ASS (excuse my French).
MW
MW
Despite what I may have said earlier, I include "MW" as a suffix to my posts because it gives them a nice, tidy end point. Psychologically, it is the same reason why I don't really like convertibles: the car looks incomplete. I hope that answers your question .CastleRock wrote: Can I just ask why you feel the need to type MW at the end of every post? Well I completely understand that it can sometimes be difficult for someone to remember their own initials, you do know your screen name is displayed beside all your posts? Because honestly, the rest of us know where display names are located, so I can only imagine that placing your initials at the end of every post fulfills some need of yours.
You know, I actually see myself as a crusader (crusaderette?) of a sort, against douchebags, and hence, a positive influence on these forums. If I am wrong, I admit it; the problem is people who are sometimes wrong but are too egotistical to concede a point. I've already started not replying to every stupid post, so your proclamation above is/was really unnecessary.beachbum wrote:Dear everyone,
Please do not give MW attention. She (?) will respond to every. single. one. of your posts with a snide, self-serving remark, which you will feel compelled to refute. This will escalate into a full-scale argument which will quickly degenerate into baseless mud-slinging and name-calling. The thread will be locked, and everyone will come away feeling dumber for having ever entered into the discussion. This process was repeated several times yesterday, bringing into question MW's continued (undesirable?) presence on these forums. Just a heads-up.
BB
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
MysticalWheel wrote:beachbum wrote:Dear everyone,
Please do not give MW attention. She (?) will respond to every. single. one. of your posts with a snide, self-serving remark, which you will feel compelled to refute. This will escalate into a full-scale argument which will quickly degenerate into baseless mud-slinging and name-calling. The thread will be locked, and everyone will come away feeling dumber for having ever entered into the discussion. This process was repeated several times yesterday, bringing into question MW's continued (undesirable?) presence on these forums. Just a heads-up.
BBYou know, I actually see myself as a crusader of a sort, against douchebags, and hence, a positive influence on these forums. If I am wrong, I admit it; the problem is people who are sometimes wrong but are too egotistical to concede a point. I've already started not replying to every stupid post, so your proclamation above is/was really unnecessary.
I no substance to add here.
FTFYResolutePear wrote:MysticalWheel wrote:beachbum wrote:Dear everyone,
Please do not give MW attention. She (?) will respond to every. single. one. of your posts with a snide, self-serving remark, which you will feel compelled to refute. This will escalate into a full-scale argument which will quickly degenerate into baseless mud-slinging and name-calling. The thread will be locked, and everyone will come away feeling dumber for having ever entered into the discussion. This process was repeated several times yesterday, bringing into question MW's continued (undesirable?) presence on these forums. Just a heads-up.
BBYou know, I actually see myself as a crusader of a sort, against douchebags, and hence, a positive influence on these forums. If I am wrong, I admit it; the problem is people who are sometimes wrong but are too egotistical to concede a point. I've already started not replying to every stupid post, so your proclamation above is/was really unnecessary.
I have no substance to add here.
BORN and BRED for SUCCESS and ACHIEVEMENT
The best you can do in my response is to point out that my posts on an internet forum regularly use sentence fragments?MysticalWheel wrote:Shhhh...go write some more sentence fragments- it'll make you feel better. And if Harvard is a rejection, then I guess I'll have to settle for Stanford...awww shucks lol.firemedicprelaw wrote:
To MW: Chill. Seriously. Obtain prescription for THC or one of the popular benzos for anxiety. Take said prescription. You will like us all a lot more, and will think we are a lot funnier, status-post "high." It will also make your rejection from HYS more palatable, just FYI.
MW
Lol...I hope you rationalize better in LS.firemedicprelaw wrote:The best you can do in my response is to point out that my posts on an internet forum regularly use sentence fragments?MysticalWheel wrote:Shhhh...go write some more sentence fragments- it'll make you feel better. And if Harvard is a rejection, then I guess I'll have to settle for Stanford...awww shucks lol.firemedicprelaw wrote:
To MW: Chill. Seriously. Obtain prescription for THC or one of the popular benzos for anxiety. Take said prescription. You will like us all a lot more, and will think we are a lot funnier, status-post "high." It will also make your rejection from HYS more palatable, just FYI.
MW
You are the reason, BTW, that LS admissions should use interviews.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Do you think she is more or less of a cunt in real life?beachbum wrote:Well, here we go again.
I'm actually legitimately curious. And I really want to know what she looks like. Maybe it's just morbid curiosity on my end, but I think it would explain a lot. Hopefully someone at HCCN finds her out next year.paratactical wrote:Do you think she is more or less of a cunt in real life?beachbum wrote:Well, here we go again.
Flameparatactical wrote:Do you think she is more or less of a cunt in real life?beachbum wrote:Well, here we go again.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Generally the guys who are this awful are either really really attractive and stupid or really really ugly. Given her LSAT, I'm guessing she's an objective 3.beachbum wrote:I'm actually legitimately curious. And I really want to know what she looks like. Maybe it's just morbid curiosity on my end, but I think it would explain a lot. Hopefully someone at HCCN finds her out next year.paratactical wrote:Do you think she is more or less of a cunt in real life?beachbum wrote:Well, here we go again.
Would you hit?paratactical wrote:Generally the guys who are this awful are either really really attractive and stupid or really really ugly. Given her LSAT, I'm guessing she's an objective 3.beachbum wrote:I'm actually legitimately curious. And I really want to know what she looks like. Maybe it's just morbid curiosity on my end, but I think it would explain a lot. Hopefully someone at HCCN finds her out next year.paratactical wrote:Do you think she is more or less of a cunt in real life?beachbum wrote:Well, here we go again.
No. I never sleep with girls that annoying, unless they're hot and okay with ball gags.JazzOne wrote: Would you hit?
I'd hit, just to shut her up.paratactical wrote:No. I never sleep with girls that annoying, unless they're hot and okay with ball gags.JazzOne wrote: Would you hit?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login