Page 1 of 1

All or nothing?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:32 pm
by hennenr
With a 2.82 GPA I am banking on a 170+ lsat to get me into a decent law school but my question is if for some reason I score in the 163-166 range would it be best for me to enroll in a lower tier school (Golden Gate or John Marshall - Chicago) or pursue another path besides law school. Please offer relevant advice because I'm really not interested in responses that start arguments about whether it is worth it to attend GGU or JM. Just looking for some advice. Thanks.

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:48 pm
by Patriot1208
different career path

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:58 pm
by shutterbug
I love it when people on this site, all of whom want to become lawyers themselves, advocate "different career path" to others.

To the OP: Get as high an LSAT score you can and aim high. A 163-166 will get you something MUCH better than the schools you listed. If those schools are the only ones you get into, then go to one of them.

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:02 pm
by ggocat
If you don't attend a national school, focus on limiting your debt.

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:02 pm
by Ty Webb
hennenr wrote:With a 2.82 GPA I am banking on a 170+ lsat to get me into a decent law school but my question is if for some reason I score in the 163-166 range would it be best for me to enroll in a lower tier school (Golden Gate or John Marshall - Chicago) or pursue another path besides law school. Please offer relevant advice because I'm really not interested in responses that start arguments about whether it is worth it to attend GGU or JM. Just looking for some advice. Thanks.
I got into a lower T1 with a 2.3x, 166, and my last semester of college clocking in at a 1.32 GPA.

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:05 pm
by Hey-O
Ty Webb wrote:
hennenr wrote:With a 2.82 GPA I am banking on a 170+ lsat to get me into a decent law school but my question is if for some reason I score in the 163-166 range would it be best for me to enroll in a lower tier school (Golden Gate or John Marshall - Chicago) or pursue another path besides law school. Please offer relevant advice because I'm really not interested in responses that start arguments about whether it is worth it to attend GGU or JM. Just looking for some advice. Thanks.
I got into a lower T1 with a 2.3x, 166, and my last semester of college clocking in at a 1.32 GPA.
Yikes! 1.32 Nice work.

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:05 pm
by Great Satchmo
hennenr wrote:With a 2.82 GPA I am banking on a 170+ lsat to get me into a decent law school but my question is if for some reason I score in the 163-166 range would it be best for me to enroll in a lower tier school (Golden Gate or John Marshall - Chicago) or pursue another path besides law school. Please offer relevant advice because I'm really not interested in responses that start arguments about whether it is worth it to attend GGU or JM. Just looking for some advice. Thanks.
I think you can pretty much expect for everyone to say "no, it's not worth it". But that is the nature of this forum.

I know that GGU, although many students are happy with their experience there and feel as though they have some options for work, they are in dire straits in the economy and with the amount of debt, without a scholarship, that you accrue.

If you are going to a 3rd or 4th tier school, I'd suggest looking in smaller markets (no SF, Chicago, LA, NY, etc) because the competition will likely be less and the fact that you attend a 3rd or 4th tier school will matter less.

It just seems in your interest to work as hard as possible on studying for the LSAT, and seeing where things are when the dust settles.

Alternatively, you could also look at applying to some part-time programs, which generally have lower entry requirements, then either stay PT or transfer to full-time after a year.

You have options, just work hard on the LSAT now and don't be discouraged if this is something you truly want to do.

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:06 pm
by Ty Webb
Hey-O wrote:
Ty Webb wrote:
hennenr wrote:With a 2.82 GPA I am banking on a 170+ lsat to get me into a decent law school but my question is if for some reason I score in the 163-166 range would it be best for me to enroll in a lower tier school (Golden Gate or John Marshall - Chicago) or pursue another path besides law school. Please offer relevant advice because I'm really not interested in responses that start arguments about whether it is worth it to attend GGU or JM. Just looking for some advice. Thanks.
I got into a lower T1 with a 2.3x, 166, and my last semester of college clocking in at a 1.32 GPA.
Yikes! 1.32 Nice work.
That wasn't even my worst semester. :shock: :cry:

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:07 pm
by Great Satchmo
Ty Webb wrote: I got into a lower T1 with a 2.3x, 166, and my last semester of college clocking in at a 1.32 GPA.
Wow, I'm impressed.

Ok, then maybe GGU is way under-shooting for the OP if he does decent on the LSAT.

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:09 pm
by 09042014
ggocat wrote:If you don't attend a national school, focus on limiting your debt.
And here the crux of his situation. No decent school is going to give a 2.82/163 anything near a full ride. Nobody wants to give people with a low GPA a full ride because 2.8 is below median at all but the most rancid TTTs.

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:15 pm
by juevonate
OP: Why do you want to go to law school?

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:17 pm
by jennylynn
If you want to go to law school, go to law school. :)

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:18 pm
by 09042014
jennylynn wrote:If you want to go to law school, go to law school. :)

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 5:20 pm
by Patriot1208
shutterbug wrote:I love it when people on this site, all of whom want to become lawyers themselves, advocate "different career path" to others.

To the OP: Get as high an LSAT score you can and aim high. A 163-166 will get you something MUCH better than the schools you listed. If those schools are the only ones you get into, then go to one of them.
He said if he did so badly that he had to go to golden gate. Giving blow jobs for nickles and crack is a better career move than going to golden gate.

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 7:33 pm
by hennenr
juevonate wrote:OP: Why do you want to go to law school?
Because I have always been interested in the law and from what I have read about law school and practicing law I feel it would be a great fit for my personality. I think it would make me happy.

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 2:31 pm
by juevonate
Well, study your butt off for the LSAT. Don't leave anything on the table. Buy the Bibles, take at least the past 30 under strict timed conditions, and go over all the questions you're unsure of. It has to be a focus of your life.

Second, consider interning at a law office. Try to work connections. You might not be able to find something prestigous, but some public-defender type should be willing to accept some free work. With your numbers, you really shouldn't commit to law school until you've actually tasted law.

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 12:38 am
by stj2013
You could probably get some seriously decent money from some tier 2s with an LSAT in that range and your gpa. Check out LSN for people with your number range and see what schools gave them money and apply to those schools. Of course, do well enough on your LSAT and you won't have to worry about it! I think that if I had spent all that time I spent reading TLS on studying for the LSAT instead I would have got a 180... :lol:

Re: All or nothing?

Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:11 am
by TheTopBloke
All.