Page 1 of 1
Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:47 pm
by lolwut
Discuss.
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:47 pm
by You Gotta Have Faith
Would you care to post a link (preferably without a photo) so that we know what you're talking about?
Btw, if you're a troll, that's okay. I just felt compelled to respond to Quagmire.
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:48 pm
by lolwut
You Gotta Have Faith wrote:Would you care to post a link (preferably without a photo) so that we know what you're talking about?
--LinkRemoved--
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:49 pm
by You Gotta Have Faith
NOT what we were looking for. I said NO images. Damn you Quagmire.
Someone lock this thread...?
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:50 pm
by lolwut
You Gotta Have Faith wrote:NOT what we were looking for. I said NO images. Damn you Quagmire.
Someone lock this thread...?
This is serious.... fcc implications?
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:51 pm
by Kohinoor
Shrieking madness.
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:53 pm
by D. H2Oman
Thought she had a penis?
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:53 pm
by 09042014
D. H2Oman wrote:Thought she had a penis?
There is a clink on that page that shows her with one.
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:53 pm
by brose002
Well that was interesting
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:55 pm
by Great Satchmo
If that link shows it...I can't get off work and home fast enough...
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:56 pm
by Rand M.
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:56 pm
by 09042014
Great Satchmo wrote:If that link shows it...I can't get off work and home fast enough...
You mostly see the roast beef not the whole sandwich.
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:58 pm
by lolwut
Great Satchmo wrote:If that link shows it...I can't get off work and home fast enough...
It's not pretty. Anyone good with disguisting adjectives care to help Great Satchmo envision this?
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:59 pm
by Mr. Matlock
Desert Fox wrote:You mostly see the roast beef not the whole sandwich.
Which is MORE than enough.
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:37 pm
by Great Satchmo
By the way:
Thank you for capitalizing "Vagina".
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:47 pm
by Belili
If I'd seen it, I'd bring an NIED claim. But I refuse to click that link
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:55 pm
by lawhawk
Look again. I think it was smoking something...
gross picture all around.
edit: what about her D?....
http://getnloose.com/wp-content/uploads ... -penis.jpg
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:57 pm
by slider
Perhaps she is just trying to prove she doesn't have a penis.
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:05 pm
by gdane
She must not be familiar with the UK's "Penal" Codes...
Re: Legal implications of Lady Gaga's Vagina exposure.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:33 pm
by Great Satchmo
lolwut wrote:Great Satchmo wrote:If that link shows it...I can't get off work and home fast enough...
It's not pretty. Anyone good with disguisting adjectives care to help Great Satchmo envision this?
Are we talking mailbox, stuffed with roast beef, then had a firecracker lit in the middle of it?
