Page 1 of 3

.

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:42 am
by texlawtex
.

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:45 am
by gochrisgo
I like where you're going with this.

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:47 am
by windycity
texlawtex wrote:.
+1

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:48 am
by gochrisgo
windycity wrote:
texlawtex wrote:.
+1
blatant anti-GULC trolling.

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:53 am
by holydonkey
Great idea, but will it work?

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:55 am
by utilitarianjac
,

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:57 am
by reasonabledoubt
In the absence of darkness light prevails?

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:58 am
by keemos
I already own the rights to that idea. Prepare for the worst

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:59 am
by reasonabledoubt
keemos wrote:I already own the rights to that idea. Prepare for the worst
ITT, I always do.

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:03 am
by holydonkey
Also - I can see why you had to do it, but do you think she'll ever forgive you?

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:03 am
by ec2xs
lawschoolpredictor.com

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:04 am
by keemos
holydonkey wrote:Also - I can see why you had to do it, but do you think she'll ever forgive you?

By the looks of it, she'd be stupid not to

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:07 am
by Vincent Vega
ec2xs wrote:lawschoolpredictor.com
titcr

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:09 am
by holydonkey
Halibut6 wrote:
ec2xs wrote:lawschoolpredictor.com
titcr
^ This. hth

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:09 am
by reasonabledoubt
Halibut6 wrote:
ec2xs wrote:lawschoolpredictor.com
titcr
--LinkRemoved--

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:16 am
by holydonkey
You know, after rereading your post, I really think you should delete it. A number of religious, ethnic, and social groups will find it highly offensive. Someone needs to visit the museum of tolerance...and have a talk with sexual harassment panda.

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:18 am
by windycity
utilitarianjac wrote:,
flame!

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:21 am
by $1.99
FTW

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:23 am
by TTTennis
windycity wrote:
utilitarianjac wrote:,
flame!
The nerve of some of these people. You should be ashamed of yourself windycity. I don't care what he says, you getting into HYS from Cooley top 50% is legit, and I believe you.

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:28 am
by Rowinguy2009
Perfect example of TLS ellitism

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:29 am
by Cupidity
Seriously, until you've acutally taken the LSAT, stop wasting our time.

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:30 am
by ATOIsp07
maxi pads.

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:31 am
by TTTennis
If you have a tribal card that will help.

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:33 am
by holydonkey
Sorry, a libertarian is not considered URM.

Re: .

Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:34 am
by Vincent Vega
holydonkey wrote:Sorry, a libertarian is not considered URM.
That's unfortunate - I could use a boost.