who is more impressive to you:
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 6:22 pm
top 5% + Law review at TTT like Drake/Albany/Mercer/NYLS
OR
top top 1/2 at somewhere like GULC/Duke/Cornell
OR
top top 1/2 at somewhere like GULC/Duke/Cornell
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=103448
+1traehekat wrote:Former, I think. Law school is pretty difficult no matter where you go, from what I gather. Top 5% is impressive anywhere, plus students at lower ranked schools are often more competitive than students at higher ranked schools (due to the desire to transfer).
Aren't those roughly the biglaw cutoffs ITE?Bosque wrote:You guys realize you are talking about top third at Cornell vs. top 5% at New York Law School, right? Right? How is this even a question?
The lack of research and foresight it took to actually enroll there kinda disqualifies them from the competition.
TITCR. TLSOli wrote:Any TLSer that says former is a dirty liar tryin to look good
Top 5% at NYLS was the biglaw cut-off before ITE.im_blue wrote:Aren't those roughly the biglaw cutoffs ITE?Bosque wrote:You guys realize you are talking about top third at Cornell vs. top 5% at New York Law School, right? Right? How is this even a question?
The lack of research and foresight it took to actually enroll there kinda disqualifies them from the competition.
It may be difficult but its graded on a curve. People at Georgetown are smarter on average.traehekat wrote:Former, I think. Law school is pretty difficult no matter where you go, from what I gather. Top 5% is impressive anywhere, plus students at lower ranked schools are often more competitive than students at higher ranked schools (due to the desire to transfer).
ITE would probably make the cuttoff top 2/3%, now making biglaw practically out of reach for NYLS peeps. gone are the days when NYLS students had a realistic chance at biglaw.rayiner wrote:Top 5% at NYLS was the biglaw cut-off before ITE.im_blue wrote:Aren't those roughly the biglaw cutoffs ITE?Bosque wrote:You guys realize you are talking about top third at Cornell vs. top 5% at New York Law School, right? Right? How is this even a question?
The lack of research and foresight it took to actually enroll there kinda disqualifies them from the competition.
TITCR.Thirteen wrote:The former is more impressive, but I would rather be the latter.
Seriously? The minimum for getting into Cornell requires four years of slacking in UG and excelling for three hours of your life.JazzOne wrote:I say the latter. Doing well in law school is one thing, but getting into a top law shows long-term commitment.
Few people excel for those three hours without a lot of prep (either in UG or independently).vanwinkle wrote:Seriously? The minimum for getting into Cornell requires four years of slacking in UG and excelling for three hours of your life.JazzOne wrote:I say the latter. Doing well in law school is one thing, but getting into a top law shows long-term commitment.
And the minimum for NYLS is four years slacking and then massively fucking up a three hour test.vanwinkle wrote:Seriously? The minimum for getting into Cornell requires four years of slacking in UG and excelling for three hours of your life.JazzOne wrote:I say the latter. Doing well in law school is one thing, but getting into a top law shows long-term commitment.
+1, I have a bit of perspective on thisDesert Fox wrote:It may be difficult but its graded on a curve. People at Georgetown are smarter on average.traehekat wrote:Former, I think. Law school is pretty difficult no matter where you go, from what I gather. Top 5% is impressive anywhere, plus students at lower ranked schools are often more competitive than students at higher ranked schools (due to the desire to transfer).
Not sure if that is directed at me, but in any case I was talking about my undergrad...Space_Cowboy wrote:Which one describes you best?
Attending a T2/T3 school with hopes of Big Law
OR
Attending a lower T-14 and are worried about career prospects?