Federal Courthouse
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 5:55 pm
Has anyone tried to watch a case in federal court before? Is there anything I should know before heading down to the courthouse, or is everything pretty straight forward?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=102878
It doesn't matter if you've never witnessed a court room in action. Many attorneys don't witness it for years. Being a lawyer does not automatically translate to mean being in court. Don't waste your time, honestly.babaghanouj wrote:Am planning on doing this soon. It was strange when I realized the other day that I've never actually witnessed a court in action.
No, no, no, it just sounds like fun/something I should do. I imagine this is the case for the OP as well.Kiersten1985 wrote:Wait, are you going to a courthouse to decide if you want to be a lawyer???
Oh ok. I was going to start feeling incredibly bad for you guys if you expected to go see what your future life would be like or something.babaghanouj wrote:No, no, no, it just sounds like fun/something I should do. I imagine this is the case for the OP as well.Kiersten1985 wrote:Wait, are you going to a courthouse to decide if you want to be a lawyer???
+1Kiersten1985 wrote:Wait, are you going to a courthouse to decide if you want to be a lawyer???
This might seem counterintuitive, but that's a slightly terrible idea. Cases rarely go to court and usually big shot attorneys (e.g. partners) actually try the ones that do. And they're usually incredibly boring to watch, by the way.
Go work at a firm and find out what day to day life is actually like for an attorney. That's how you decide to go or not.
Just because many attorneys rarely if ever see a courtroom does not mean that visiting a courthouse is a bad idea. Especially if a career in litigation is a goal.Kiersten1985 wrote:It doesn't matter if you've never witnessed a court room in action. Many attorneys don't witness it for years. Being a lawyer does not automatically translate to mean being in court. Don't waste your time, honestly.babaghanouj wrote:Am planning on doing this soon. It was strange when I realized the other day that I've never actually witnessed a court in action.
By "go to state" you mean appellate court?Lermontov wrote:+1Kiersten1985 wrote:Wait, are you going to a courthouse to decide if you want to be a lawyer???
This might seem counterintuitive, but that's a slightly terrible idea. Cases rarely go to court and usually big shot attorneys (e.g. partners) actually try the ones that do. And they're usually incredibly boring to watch, by the way.
Go work at a firm and find out what day to day life is actually like for an attorney. That's how you decide to go or not.
If, however, you're just going to check it out, it's really easy. Most district courts have a website that you can use to figure out when trials would be, and you can just go watch. But, you should definitely go to state instead (even easier to go and watch because there are more people in the chamber). Federal cases are long, complicated, and one afternoon of watching will learn you very little about how any of it works. State cases, you could get lucky and see a whole thing go down in just a few hours, from openings to testimony to closings.
Also, as a by the bye, most court appearances are not trials, they're hearings. And hearings are even more interesting than trials on a fun-per-minute scale.
No, I'm not at all saying that it's a bad idea to go see one. I'm saying it's a bad idea if you're seeing one to determine if you want to be an attorney or not. If that's your only basis, then you're kidding yourself.Campagnolo wrote:Just because many attorneys rarely if ever see a courtroom does not mean that visiting a courthouse is a bad idea. Especially if a career in litigation is a goal.Kiersten1985 wrote:It doesn't matter if you've never witnessed a court room in action. Many attorneys don't witness it for years. Being a lawyer does not automatically translate to mean being in court. Don't waste your time, honestly.babaghanouj wrote:Am planning on doing this soon. It was strange when I realized the other day that I've never actually witnessed a court in action.
This seems very odd to me that people are applying to law school without seeing all aspects of the profession first. Why judge things off of Boston Legal when the real deal is in my backyard?
I saw a case about a lesbian love triangle. While the defendant was on the stand, the other two estranged lovers cast stabbing glances at each other from the gallery. It was awesome to behold.SamSeaborn2016 wrote:I don't think visiting a court room will hurt anything. I used to sit in pretty regularly on different trials and hearings during my breaks and lunches when I was a traffic court clerk. They range from stab-out-your-own-eyes-boring all the way up to practically stand up comedy.
Nice. Fun that you got to go (and especially see something interesting). You asked earlier if I meant appellate when I said state court. I really just meant the lowest level of trial court at a state level. Just personal opinion, but for someone who doesn't know anything about the case, I think that that's usually the most interesting level to watch.Campagnolo wrote:I saw a case about a lesbian love triangle. While the defendant was on the stand, the other two estranged lovers cast stabbing glances at each other from the gallery. It was awesome to behold.SamSeaborn2016 wrote:I don't think visiting a court room will hurt anything. I used to sit in pretty regularly on different trials and hearings during my breaks and lunches when I was a traffic court clerk. They range from stab-out-your-own-eyes-boring all the way up to practically stand up comedy.