Page 1 of 1
Pennsylvania - difference between simple assault and terroristic threat
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2016 1:10 am
by caveman2
What's the main difference between simple assault and a terroristic threat in PA crim law? You can commit a simple assault by "attempting to put another in fear of imminent serious bodily injury" via a threat, but you can commit a terroristic threat by "a direct or indirect communication to commit a crime of violence with the intent to terrorize another." Those kind of sound like the same thing to me. Any thoughts on this?
Re: Pennsylvania - difference between simple assault and terroristic threat
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2016 11:51 am
by Gamecubesupreme
I am not sure on this, but I remember from THEMIS' graded essay question that one way to draw this hair-splitting distinction the PA Bar Examiners used one year (yeah, apparently this was tested) was when the defendant threatened another with a gun, but did NOT put her finger on the trigger.
Apparently that was the difference between simple assault (finger NOT on trigger) and terroristic threat (finger ON trigger).
Re: Pennsylvania - difference between simple assault and terroristic threat
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2016 12:56 pm
by caveman2
Wow...that is ridiculous.