Personal Thoughts on Themis v. Barbri (used both)
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 2:50 am
I used Themis before and passed a pretty hard state (CA). My employer now pays, and I am using Barbri for an easier state.
Couple of random thoughts:
Barbri provides a better introduction to the law in their basic materials. The lectures seemed like a better priming for the materials on the test--they actually add value. Themis covered a larger set of material in less depth. I am a bit nervous with Barbri because I understand the significant material much better now (the rules that I will have to explain for essays). But with Themis I understood more material more shallowly at a recitation level. A good example of this is with evidence. I understand the mechanics of character evidence really well/better with Barbri, but sometimes I will look at my old Themis materials and see that they touched upon some issues like authentication of certain types of tangible evidence that Barbri barely covered. Seriously, like Themis doesn't really explain things that well, the statements of law they give are a bit cumbersome, but you will know a ton of black letter law at a level that will help you catch a couple of extra MBEs questions.
Barbri's MBEs are stupid, Themis's are pretty straightforward/closer to the MBE. I mean, Barbri is useful if you want mental exercises to help you learn law for the essays. But, Barbri's MBEs are horrible to actually give you an idea where you are at for the MBE or prepare you to take the MBE. It is kind of like how everyone mocked the people that took Kaplan for the LSAT because Kaplan's materials were simulated and even contained some question types that didn't really exist.
Barbri provides much better essay materials. The book of essays and examples is great. Themis graded more essays, but I didn't feel like I had as many outlines to review and learn. If you don't feel like you are a good technical writer, Barbri's materials are decent.
To sum it up, I think the people that study hard and fail with Barbri probably weren't well prepared for the nature of the MBE questions, focused too hard on too few questions, and then ended up not finishing and/or also missed a bunch of questions that were based on black letter law that barbri didn't cover in its basic materials. The people that fail with Themis will have somewhat of an idea with each MBE question and be well prepared for the pace, but will probably walk out of the test saying "I feel like I knew only 40%, but got it down to two answers on 60% and guessed" because they didn't know the tests well enough.
Couple of random thoughts:
Barbri provides a better introduction to the law in their basic materials. The lectures seemed like a better priming for the materials on the test--they actually add value. Themis covered a larger set of material in less depth. I am a bit nervous with Barbri because I understand the significant material much better now (the rules that I will have to explain for essays). But with Themis I understood more material more shallowly at a recitation level. A good example of this is with evidence. I understand the mechanics of character evidence really well/better with Barbri, but sometimes I will look at my old Themis materials and see that they touched upon some issues like authentication of certain types of tangible evidence that Barbri barely covered. Seriously, like Themis doesn't really explain things that well, the statements of law they give are a bit cumbersome, but you will know a ton of black letter law at a level that will help you catch a couple of extra MBEs questions.
Barbri's MBEs are stupid, Themis's are pretty straightforward/closer to the MBE. I mean, Barbri is useful if you want mental exercises to help you learn law for the essays. But, Barbri's MBEs are horrible to actually give you an idea where you are at for the MBE or prepare you to take the MBE. It is kind of like how everyone mocked the people that took Kaplan for the LSAT because Kaplan's materials were simulated and even contained some question types that didn't really exist.
Barbri provides much better essay materials. The book of essays and examples is great. Themis graded more essays, but I didn't feel like I had as many outlines to review and learn. If you don't feel like you are a good technical writer, Barbri's materials are decent.
To sum it up, I think the people that study hard and fail with Barbri probably weren't well prepared for the nature of the MBE questions, focused too hard on too few questions, and then ended up not finishing and/or also missed a bunch of questions that were based on black letter law that barbri didn't cover in its basic materials. The people that fail with Themis will have somewhat of an idea with each MBE question and be well prepared for the pace, but will probably walk out of the test saying "I feel like I knew only 40%, but got it down to two answers on 60% and guessed" because they didn't know the tests well enough.