Page 1 of 1

Chicago Biglaw salaries?

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 12:11 am
by bobbyshmurdah
Does anyone know what the lockstep salary is for years 1-7 at Chicago offices? How does this compare to NY?

Re: Chicago Biglaw salaries?

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 12:22 am
by Johann
A lot are the same. But some aren't. Perhaps you should be more specific.

Re: Chicago Biglaw salaries?

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 1:00 am
by bobbyshmurdah
Vault 30?

Re: Chicago Biglaw salaries?

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 1:14 am
by 2014
I'm almost positive that Skadden, Kirkland, Latham, Sidley, Jones Day, Ropes, Paul Hastings and Baker McKenzie all pay 160. There are others that pay 145 as you go further down the prestige chain.

I think the lockstep raises of the above firms mostly mirror NY market.

Re: Chicago Biglaw salaries?

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 11:56 am
by blackcup
2014 wrote:I'm almost positive that Skadden, Kirkland, Latham, Sidley, Jones Day, Ropes, Paul Hastings and Baker McKenzie all pay 160. There are others that pay 145 as you go further down the prestige chain.

I think the lockstep raises of the above firms mostly mirror NY market.
V30 Chicago all pay 160K starting but none of the firms in Chicago are pure lockstep. Kirkland likely pays more, while others are more black box with their "modified lockstep" approaches.

Re: Chicago Biglaw salaries?

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 12:19 pm
by 2014
Isn't at least K&E the same until the "partner" stage? Not talking about bonuses.

Re: Chicago Biglaw salaries?

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 11:49 am
by Cobretti
blackcup wrote:
2014 wrote:I'm almost positive that Skadden, Kirkland, Latham, Sidley, Jones Day, Ropes, Paul Hastings and Baker McKenzie all pay 160. There are others that pay 145 as you go further down the prestige chain.

I think the lockstep raises of the above firms mostly mirror NY market.
V30 Chicago all pay 160K starting but none of the firms in Chicago are pure lockstep. Kirkland likely pays more, while others are more black box with their "modified lockstep" approaches.
Skadden?

Re: Chicago Biglaw salaries?

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 12:01 pm
by Johann
2014 wrote:Isn't at least K&E the same until the "partner" stage? Not talking about bonuses.
I'm not aware of any Chicago firm that starts at 160 and doesn't follow lockstep. Not an expert on the issue, though. Not talking about bonuses because those are a different animal.

Re: Chicago Biglaw salaries?

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 1:39 pm
by blackcup
JohannDeMann wrote:
2014 wrote:Isn't at least K&E the same until the "partner" stage? Not talking about bonuses.
I'm not aware of any Chicago firm that starts at 160 and doesn't follow lockstep. Not an expert on the issue, though. Not talking about bonuses because those are a different animal.
Sorry. I was talking about total comp and not salaries. My mistake.

Re: Chicago Biglaw salaries?

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 11:51 pm
by Cobretti
blackcup wrote:
JohannDeMann wrote:
2014 wrote:Isn't at least K&E the same until the "partner" stage? Not talking about bonuses.
I'm not aware of any Chicago firm that starts at 160 and doesn't follow lockstep. Not an expert on the issue, though. Not talking about bonuses because those are a different animal.
Sorry. I was talking about total comp and not salaries. My mistake.
Cobretti wrote:Skadden?

Re: Chicago Biglaw salaries?

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 12:00 am
by Johann
I believe Skadden is NYC lock step.

Re: Chicago Biglaw salaries?

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 12:09 am
by Cobretti
JohannDeMann wrote:I believe Skadden is NYC lock step.
(i know it is, it wasn't actually a question)

Re: Chicago Biglaw salaries?

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 12:14 am
by Johann
Cobretti wrote:
JohannDeMann wrote:I believe Skadden is NYC lock step.
(i know it is, it wasn't actually a question)
Cool - my mistake.

Re: Chicago Biglaw salaries?

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 3:41 pm
by bloodorangedeer
Top firms track w/ NYC. Considering how much cheaper living in the Chi is than NYC, seems like a great destination city for young associates...