Lawyers who have just passed the bar/courtroom experience
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:37 am
I am not asking for legal advice in this thread.
It occurred to me when considering looking for a lawyer that perhaps many lawyers who have just passed the bar may struggle to immediately find work at a law firm, or be doing grunt work as they earn their stripes, so to speak. In such a situation, being able to act as a lead attorney in a case, file documents, argue before a judge, and so on and so forth could be valuable or desirable experience as a resume builder.
Without going into too much into specifics, a zoning appeals board make a decision on a property near where I live that I feel would not legally stand up if appealed to circuit court (Which is the next step if we wish to pursue this). I've seen video of the hearing, and there seem to be several obvious potential legal issues with a variance that was granted, and issues dealing with veracity of some key testimony, and so on and so forth. I feel I may having standing to appeal to circuit court based on quality of life issues that a business entering a residential area may have in terms of noise, traffic, etc.. In addition, I rent from a relative who owns properties that may grant him standing based on potential future loss in property value, the level of rent he is able to ask for, and so on and so forth based on the the impact of the business on those things. There's a lot more to it than that, but that's a very thin outline.
I can't afford a lawyer because I'm below the poverty line income wise, and my relative says he also can't afford a lawyer (Although really it seems in his case more a matter of limited discretionary funds and him directing them to things he values more).
So, what is going to likely happen is simply that after the 30 day window to file an appeal lapses without an appeal, these folks will be able to go forward with their new zoning and establish this business. I can't afford an attorney to file, so I lose (Well, so to speak, I am actually not involved in the process currently).
My thought was, perhaps someone trying to gain experience would want to handle something like this pro bono to gain experience. They can be a lead attorney, and since I otherwise would be without consul and unable to appeal, if someone screws something up in inadvertently due to inexperience, I'm no worse off than if I had not appealed.
The reason I thought specifically of an inexperienced lawyer here is that I making an assumption that when and if experienced lawyers do pro bono work, it's more for people who are criminal defendants or litigants with a more pressing claim and wouldn't give me the time of day on this one if I approached them about doing it pro bono since they would want whatever pro bono work they might do to be something that they deem more important. Yet, a new lawyer might just want to get into a court room and think of it as a plus that he or she can gain experience in a situation where losing is not going to be the end of the world for the client. This is important to me, but it's not like I am facing a 20 year jail term or am suing to pay medical bills or something, so, relatively speaking...
What do you all think? Not about the case, about the idea of looking for a recent bar graduate to represent me? Does it seem plausible that someone would want to take on something like this pro bono to gain experience? Or am I living in a fantasy land here? If it seems realistic that I might be able to find someone meeting that description, how would I go about doing so?
I live in the state of Maryland, if that makes a difference.
It occurred to me when considering looking for a lawyer that perhaps many lawyers who have just passed the bar may struggle to immediately find work at a law firm, or be doing grunt work as they earn their stripes, so to speak. In such a situation, being able to act as a lead attorney in a case, file documents, argue before a judge, and so on and so forth could be valuable or desirable experience as a resume builder.
Without going into too much into specifics, a zoning appeals board make a decision on a property near where I live that I feel would not legally stand up if appealed to circuit court (Which is the next step if we wish to pursue this). I've seen video of the hearing, and there seem to be several obvious potential legal issues with a variance that was granted, and issues dealing with veracity of some key testimony, and so on and so forth. I feel I may having standing to appeal to circuit court based on quality of life issues that a business entering a residential area may have in terms of noise, traffic, etc.. In addition, I rent from a relative who owns properties that may grant him standing based on potential future loss in property value, the level of rent he is able to ask for, and so on and so forth based on the the impact of the business on those things. There's a lot more to it than that, but that's a very thin outline.
I can't afford a lawyer because I'm below the poverty line income wise, and my relative says he also can't afford a lawyer (Although really it seems in his case more a matter of limited discretionary funds and him directing them to things he values more).
So, what is going to likely happen is simply that after the 30 day window to file an appeal lapses without an appeal, these folks will be able to go forward with their new zoning and establish this business. I can't afford an attorney to file, so I lose (Well, so to speak, I am actually not involved in the process currently).
My thought was, perhaps someone trying to gain experience would want to handle something like this pro bono to gain experience. They can be a lead attorney, and since I otherwise would be without consul and unable to appeal, if someone screws something up in inadvertently due to inexperience, I'm no worse off than if I had not appealed.
The reason I thought specifically of an inexperienced lawyer here is that I making an assumption that when and if experienced lawyers do pro bono work, it's more for people who are criminal defendants or litigants with a more pressing claim and wouldn't give me the time of day on this one if I approached them about doing it pro bono since they would want whatever pro bono work they might do to be something that they deem more important. Yet, a new lawyer might just want to get into a court room and think of it as a plus that he or she can gain experience in a situation where losing is not going to be the end of the world for the client. This is important to me, but it's not like I am facing a 20 year jail term or am suing to pay medical bills or something, so, relatively speaking...
What do you all think? Not about the case, about the idea of looking for a recent bar graduate to represent me? Does it seem plausible that someone would want to take on something like this pro bono to gain experience? Or am I living in a fantasy land here? If it seems realistic that I might be able to find someone meeting that description, how would I go about doing so?
I live in the state of Maryland, if that makes a difference.