salary differences between biglaw and inhouse (same ranges?)
Posted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 10:27 pm
deleted
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=225075
1st year market bonuses have been 10k the last couple of years. They do go up from there.luckystar84 wrote: 160-250 is the NYC/SF/DC/etc payscale. if you multiply 148-205k by 1.4 (in house 4-9 yrs), you easily overshoot that. I know there are bonuses but I just know Cravath's bonuses are about 15-25k for a first year. Do they go up from there? And in-house has bonuses too.
The point about not leaving before picking up the requisite skills (lol beyond due diligence) is a good one, but the data doesn't seem to support the statement that you take a paycut by jumping from a biglaw job @ X percentile to an inhouse job @ X percentile.
Entry to mid guy in a GC office is not getting a 40% cash bonus. At a middle of the road F1000 Cash bonus is maybe 10% and real equity grants only to people at VP/SVP level (title varies by org chart) and higher. Most of the people I know who are in-house left the firm in the 3rd/4th year range and have all-in comp in the 135-190k range with one outlier at 200k+. The only one, of a handful, I know who didn't take at least some pay cut went in-house at a major PE firm.luckystar84 wrote:160-250 is the NYC/SF/DC/etc payscale. if you multiply 148-205k by 1.4 (in house 4-9 yrs), you easily overshoot that. I know there are bonuses but I just know Cravath's bonuses are about 15-25k for a first year. Do they go up from there? And in-house has bonuses too.Tiago Splitter wrote:The Biglaw payscale goes 160, 170, 185, 210, 230, 250... with bonuses on top of that. So at any point on the continuum you'll very often be taking a paycut to go in-house. It's also not like all these jobs are available at all times; most companies expect you to come from the firm with the set of skills they need, so if you didn't learn those skills or haven't yet learned them, those in-house jobs won't be available to you.
The other big thing is that if you move to a legal department at a big company too early you may very well be stuck in that role for a long time. In-house legal roles often provide very little opportunity for advancement (which is where the real salary increases are), so as with most career moves it's important to pick the right one and not just jump at the first opportunity.
The point about not leaving before picking up the requisite skills (lol beyond due diligence) is a good one, but the data doesn't seem to support the statement that you take a paycut by jumping from a biglaw job @ X percentile to an inhouse job @ X percentile.
Really depends on the individual company's compensation structure and whether or not the cash bonus is a true bonus or a variable component to pay. I know of a F100 that pays its lawyers a base in the range of $120k-200k + a yearly variable component meant to have a yearly average of 20-40% of base on a five-year rolling basis. Variable component is determined by objective company-wide benchmarks. On top of that, 10% of employees will receive a discretionary bonus that can reach up to 10% of base.AllTheLawz wrote:
Entry to mid guy in a GC office is not getting a 40% cash bonus. At a middle of the road F1000 Cash bonus is maybe 10% and real equity grants only to people at VP/SVP level (title varies by org chart) and higher. Most of the people I know who are in-house left the firm in the 3rd/4th year range and have all-in comp in the 135-190k range with one outlier at 200k+. The only one, of a handful, I know who didn't take at least some pay cut went in-house at a major PE firm.