Page 1 of 1

Are westlaw BLUEBOOK cites ever wrong?

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 10:34 pm
by Wakelaw15
I used a westlaw cite and it was marked wrong. I'm wondering is it possible that the cute is wrong (are there bugs in the software)?

Re: Are westlaw BLUEBOOK cites ever wrong?

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 10:37 pm
by hephaestus
Our westlaw rep explained to us that its not exactly Bluebook for copyright concerns, but its very close. Its close enough that practitioners probably wont notice, but a LRW very well might.

Re: Are westlaw BLUEBOOK cites ever wrong?

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 10:38 pm
by Tom Joad
According to the people that have graded my LRW stuff, it is wrong all the time.

Re: Are westlaw BLUEBOOK cites ever wrong?

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 10:50 pm
by Wakelaw15
How can this be a copyright issue? BLUEBOOK sells a list of rules for formatting, what's wrong with a machine that follows those rules?

Re: Are westlaw BLUEBOOK cites ever wrong?

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 10:50 pm
by ilovesf
Yes

Re: Are westlaw BLUEBOOK cites ever wrong?

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 10:53 pm
by hephaestus
Wakelaw15 wrote:How can this be a copyright issue? BLUEBOOK sells a list of rules for formatting, what's wrong with a machine that follows those rules?
Perhaps the rep was just making something up, but the takeaway is just use your bluebook.

Re: Are westlaw BLUEBOOK cites ever wrong?

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 11:03 pm
by LS-boundNYC
I saw a lot of errors as a LRW TA this year, and I think a ton were based on simply copying and pasting from Westlaw. Be especially careful of T6 abbreviations and reporter abbreviations (esp. F. Supp.), as those were the most frequent errors I saw.

Re: Are westlaw BLUEBOOK cites ever wrong?

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 11:27 pm
by cinephile
I know Lexis is often wrong, but I use their cites anyway.

Re: Are westlaw BLUEBOOK cites ever wrong?

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 11:38 pm
by sambeber
Happens all the time. Spacing is wrong, abbreviations are wrong, all sorts of stuff is wrong.