question about 1L performance/transfers
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:38 pm
Am a splitter. Slightly sub 2.5 and 173 LSAT score. Applied early and was accepted to a Top 25-29 school.
The reason I was likely admitted to the 25-29 school was because of my high LSAT score, that they were willing to take the gpa hit. A 25-29 school isnt bad obviously and its in my best interest to attain first year grades as high as possible, as I would like it to be possible that if I do well, I can transfer up even but not counting on being a transfer. I am happy attending the school I got admitted to. I know everyone says dont attend a law school with the intention of transferring -- well, thats certainly not what I did, my goal was to get into the best school I could and given the gpa, I dont think I could do much better since I dont have relevant WE and have a low gpa.
Sorry for the hypothetical question but here goes....If you attend a school ranked 25-29, that is clearly tier 1, and if by chance you rock your 1L exams and place in the top 5-10 percent of your class or a bit higher, its not unreasonable then to put in transfer apps to the Top 14 (Georgetown, Duke, NYU, Columbia)....AND if by small chance I work my butt off, and it works out, can you get admitted from a 25-29 school placing top 5-10 percent OR will I have no chance because of the sub 2.5 Ugpa? They act like transfer admissions are solely on 1L performance but have schools like Duke, Georgetown, Columbia, NYU, UChicago admit transfers from T25-29 schools with a sub 2.5 UGPA? (I look at the yahoo transfers and cant find anyone with that low UGPA)
any help or insight would be appreciated -- and no sarcasm or negativity please. I worked my butt off to get a 173 and it payed off with getting into a Top 20s with a low gpa, so I have nothing to lose by aiming to try to do well 1L...and inquiring about transfers BUTI accept too that it rarely works out, but I would like advice regarding the sub 2.5 part.
The reason I was likely admitted to the 25-29 school was because of my high LSAT score, that they were willing to take the gpa hit. A 25-29 school isnt bad obviously and its in my best interest to attain first year grades as high as possible, as I would like it to be possible that if I do well, I can transfer up even but not counting on being a transfer. I am happy attending the school I got admitted to. I know everyone says dont attend a law school with the intention of transferring -- well, thats certainly not what I did, my goal was to get into the best school I could and given the gpa, I dont think I could do much better since I dont have relevant WE and have a low gpa.
Sorry for the hypothetical question but here goes....If you attend a school ranked 25-29, that is clearly tier 1, and if by chance you rock your 1L exams and place in the top 5-10 percent of your class or a bit higher, its not unreasonable then to put in transfer apps to the Top 14 (Georgetown, Duke, NYU, Columbia)....AND if by small chance I work my butt off, and it works out, can you get admitted from a 25-29 school placing top 5-10 percent OR will I have no chance because of the sub 2.5 Ugpa? They act like transfer admissions are solely on 1L performance but have schools like Duke, Georgetown, Columbia, NYU, UChicago admit transfers from T25-29 schools with a sub 2.5 UGPA? (I look at the yahoo transfers and cant find anyone with that low UGPA)
any help or insight would be appreciated -- and no sarcasm or negativity please. I worked my butt off to get a 173 and it payed off with getting into a Top 20s with a low gpa, so I have nothing to lose by aiming to try to do well 1L...and inquiring about transfers BUTI accept too that it rarely works out, but I would like advice regarding the sub 2.5 part.