Relying Solely on Study Aids or Outlines = Not Fit for Law? Forum
- scifiguy
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 2:41 pm
Relying Solely on Study Aids or Outlines = Not Fit for Law?
I have read that many people have gotten by in law school (sometimes even doing quite well) with studying outlines for some classes only and not reading the material.
Also, others seem to suggest that you can pick up a study aid that's some kind of professional tutor for law school readings (like Spark or Cliff Notes) and use those to explain (?) the readings to you.
I guess I'm kind of curious if doing this in a way that relies soley or primarily on them for your understanding and study of law would portend future struggles in the profession? Is it often a sign that the student is either not fit for law intellectually or not fit for it interest-wise (where they don't read, because they literally hate it or find it boring)?
How do students expect to read and understand the law later in biglaw, small law...etc. if aren't doing it in law school? Are there Spark NOtes or Cliff Notes for the working lawyers to use? Or is the work just different from that of law school?
Also, others seem to suggest that you can pick up a study aid that's some kind of professional tutor for law school readings (like Spark or Cliff Notes) and use those to explain (?) the readings to you.
I guess I'm kind of curious if doing this in a way that relies soley or primarily on them for your understanding and study of law would portend future struggles in the profession? Is it often a sign that the student is either not fit for law intellectually or not fit for it interest-wise (where they don't read, because they literally hate it or find it boring)?
How do students expect to read and understand the law later in biglaw, small law...etc. if aren't doing it in law school? Are there Spark NOtes or Cliff Notes for the working lawyers to use? Or is the work just different from that of law school?
Last edited by scifiguy on Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- mephistopheles
- Posts: 1936
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:43 am
- guano
- Posts: 2264
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:49 am
Re: Relying Solely on Study Aids or Outlines = Not Fit for Law?
it's a double-sided answer. Yes, it's possible to get by solely on supplements. Hell, sometimes you can't figure out what's going on in a case without them. You should probably still read cases to learn how to extract the valuable information, or to at least pinpoint the relevant texts.scifiguy wrote:I have read that many people have gotten by in law school (sometimes even doing quite well) with studying outlines for classes only and not reading the material.
Also, others seem to suggest that you can pick up a study aid that's some kind of professional tool for law school readings (like Spark or Cliff Notes) and use those to explain (?) the readings to you.
I guess I'm kind of curious if doing this in a way that relies soley or primarily on them for your understanding and study of law would portend future struggles in the profession? Is it often a sign that the student is either not fit for law intellectually or not fit for it interest-wise (where they don't read, because they literally hate it or find it boring)?
How do students expect to read and understand the law later in biglaw, small law...etc. if aren't doing it in law school? Are there Spark NOtes or Cliff Notes for the working lawyers to use? Or is the work just different from that of law school?
Professionally, there are plenty of aids, like westlaw key notes, that'll tell you the key issues of a case without having to read it, which'll allow you to review a lot more cases, but, you'll still need to read it to get the detail, or to pull a good quotation, or to have a good understanding of the matter.
- scifiguy
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 2:41 pm
Re: Relying Solely on Study Aids or Outlines = Not Fit for Law?
very interesting. And thanks.guano wrote:it's a double-sided answer. Yes, it's possible to get by solely on supplements. Hell, sometimes you can't figure out what's going on in a case without them. You should probably still read cases to learn how to extract the valuable information, or to at least pinpoint the relevant texts.scifiguy wrote:I have read that many people have gotten by in law school (sometimes even doing quite well) with studying outlines for classes only and not reading the material.
Also, others seem to suggest that you can pick up a study aid that's some kind of professional tool for law school readings (like Spark or Cliff Notes) and use those to explain (?) the readings to you.
I guess I'm kind of curious if doing this in a way that relies soley or primarily on them for your understanding and study of law would portend future struggles in the profession? Is it often a sign that the student is either not fit for law intellectually or not fit for it interest-wise (where they don't read, because they literally hate it or find it boring)?
How do students expect to read and understand the law later in biglaw, small law...etc. if aren't doing it in law school? Are there Spark NOtes or Cliff Notes for the working lawyers to use? Or is the work just different from that of law school?
Professionally, there are plenty of aids, like westlaw key notes, that'll tell you the key issues of a case without having to read it, which'll allow you to review a lot more cases, but, you'll still need to read it to get the detail, or to pull a good quotation, or to have a good understanding of the matter.
How often would you say that people come across cases that are unable to understand without the help of a study aid?
- guano
- Posts: 2264
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:49 am
Re: Relying Solely on Study Aids or Outlines = Not Fit for Law?
depends on how talented they are and how dense the material.scifiguy wrote:How often would you say that people come across cases that are unable to understand without the help of a study aid?
Torts is fairly straightforward most of the time, while Civ Pro can be a bitch.
Thing is, it's not even a matter of being able to understand the cases, sometimes it's just not worth it. It's important to learn how to read a case and figure out what's going on, but, when you're assigned a 20 page case to read that actually involves a very simple issue, it's just better use of your time to read an online brief. When it comes to outlining, it's good to create your own, but it helps to have another outline for guidance.
Also don't forget that everyone learns differently so a winning strategy for one student can be a losing strategy for another. You'll figure out what works best for you, probably by the time you finish the second semester.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Aawaldrop
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:28 am
Re: Relying Solely on Study Aids or Outlines = Not Fit for Law?
Are we pre-judging people who barely do any reading and will getting better grades than you scifiguy?
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Relying Solely on Study Aids or Outlines = Not Fit for Law?
Law school has very little to do with the actual practice of law.
- ndirish2010
- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: Relying Solely on Study Aids or Outlines = Not Fit for Law?
This guy is seriously trying to set a record for the most pointless threads and dumbest thread titles.
- Tom Joad
- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Re: Relying Solely on Study Aids or Outlines = Not Fit for Law?
All the opinions in your casebook are edited to be shorter anyway. It's not like you sit there and read entire cases for class.
- scifiguy
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 2:41 pm
Re: Relying Solely on Study Aids or Outlines = Not Fit for Law?
What % of law students would you say rely soley on thewse study aids? Or use them at all?
- scifiguy
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 2:41 pm
Re: Relying Solely on Study Aids or Outlines = Not Fit for Law?
guano wrote:it's a double-sided answer. Yes, it's possible to get by solely on supplements. Hell, sometimes you can't figure out what's going on in a case without them. You should probably still read cases to learn how to extract the valuable information, or to at least pinpoint the relevant texts.scifiguy wrote:I have read that many people have gotten by in law school (sometimes even doing quite well) with studying outlines for classes only and not reading the material.
Also, others seem to suggest that you can pick up a study aid that's some kind of professional tool for law school readings (like Spark or Cliff Notes) and use those to explain (?) the readings to you.
I guess I'm kind of curious if doing this in a way that relies soley or primarily on them for your understanding and study of law would portend future struggles in the profession? Is it often a sign that the student is either not fit for law intellectually or not fit for it interest-wise (where they don't read, because they literally hate it or find it boring)?
How do students expect to read and understand the law later in biglaw, small law...etc. if aren't doing it in law school? Are there Spark NOtes or Cliff Notes for the working lawyers to use? Or is the work just different from that of law school?
Professionally, there are plenty of aids, like westlaw key notes, that'll tell you the key issues of a case without having to read it, which'll allow you to review a lot more cases, but, you'll still need to read it to get the detail, or to pull a good quotation, or to have a good understanding of the matter.
In the actual practice of law, can you literally get by in the same way using those professional study notes/aids?
Or do you ultimately have to look at least a little bit at the actual case for looking stuff up?
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Relying Solely on Study Aids or Outlines = Not Fit for Law?
scifiguy wrote:guano wrote:it's a double-sided answer. Yes, it's possible to get by solely on supplements. Hell, sometimes you can't figure out what's going on in a case without them. You should probably still read cases to learn how to extract the valuable information, or to at least pinpoint the relevant texts.scifiguy wrote:I have read that many people have gotten by in law school (sometimes even doing quite well) with studying outlines for classes only and not reading the material.
Also, others seem to suggest that you can pick up a study aid that's some kind of professional tool for law school readings (like Spark or Cliff Notes) and use those to explain (?) the readings to you.
I guess I'm kind of curious if doing this in a way that relies soley or primarily on them for your understanding and study of law would portend future struggles in the profession? Is it often a sign that the student is either not fit for law intellectually or not fit for it interest-wise (where they don't read, because they literally hate it or find it boring)?
How do students expect to read and understand the law later in biglaw, small law...etc. if aren't doing it in law school? Are there Spark NOtes or Cliff Notes for the working lawyers to use? Or is the work just different from that of law school?
Professionally, there are plenty of aids, like westlaw key notes, that'll tell you the key issues of a case without having to read it, which'll allow you to review a lot more cases, but, you'll still need to read it to get the detail, or to pull a good quotation, or to have a good understanding of the matter.
In the actual practice of law, can you literally get by in the same way using those professional study notes/aids?
Or do you ultimately have to look at least a little bit at the actual case for looking stuff up?
Professionally, there are plenty of aids, like westlaw key notes, that'll tell you the key issues of a case without having to read it, which'll allow you to review a lot more cases, but, you'll still need to read it to get the detail, or to pull a good quotation, or to have a good understanding of the matter.
- Xifeng
- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm
Re: Relying Solely on Study Aids or Outlines = Not Fit for Law?
Nah bro, your five-color highlighter system you perfect during 1L is going to come in real handy at a firm. Just let the study aids bros cook and soon you'll be partner.scifiguy wrote:In the actual practice of law, can you literally get by in the same way using those professional study notes/aids?
Or do you ultimately have to look at least a little bit at the actual case for looking stuff up?
- mindarmed
- Posts: 957
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:16 pm
Re: Relying Solely on Study Aids or Outlines = Not Fit for Law?
180Xifeng wrote:Nah bro, your five-color highlighter system you perfect during 1L is going to come in real handy at a firm. Just let the study aids bros cook and soon you'll be partner.scifiguy wrote:In the actual practice of law, can you literally get by in the same way using those professional study notes/aids?
Or do you ultimately have to look at least a little bit at the actual case for looking stuff up?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login