Outlining/Exam Prep As a 0L Forum
- lawhopeful10
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:29 pm
Outlining/Exam Prep As a 0L
Over the last couple of months I have extensively combed this website for information relevant to succeeding in law school. 0L prep appears controversial as to its benefits, or at least substantial 0L prep such as learning the law. I wonder though if it would make sense to learn maybe 1 or 2 subjects such as torts or civil procedure for the sole purpose of exam prep. Many classify law school exam taking as a skill in itself. I am wondering if the detriment of possibly learning 2 subjects that you might have to change/relearn based on your prof will be outweighed by constantly practicing hypos before law school. On a different note how about using a wide variety of supplements to create exam skeletons/outlines for courses before you take them and then alter them based on what your prof says.
Any thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated, thanks in advance.
Any thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated, thanks in advance.
- gaud
- Posts: 5765
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 2:58 am
Re: Outlining/Exam Prep As a 0L
Read Getting To Maybe and pick up LEEWS. You should be fine with that.
- BlaqBella
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:41 am
Re: Outlining/Exam Prep As a 0L
Its been noted that how you do on exams will heavily/entirely depend on what your professor wants on an exam. As you haven't a clue who or what your professor prefers, any outlining/prep you do now will be futile.
Last edited by BlaqBella on Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- BlaqBella
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:41 am
Re: Outlining/Exam Prep As a 0L
Dany wrote:
Hey now, most of us are gunners and many 0Ls have considered such approach prior to law school. Its TLS, after all.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- lawhopeful10
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:29 pm
Re: Outlining/Exam Prep As a 0L
I am curious if the practices I described would be advantageous or give me the best possible chance at success or if 0L practice test taking could even be detrimental somehow. I am aware that many people will do well (and many will not do well) with just getting to maybe and LEEWS as their prep.
- BlaqBella
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:41 am
Re: Outlining/Exam Prep As a 0L
NO.lawhopeful10 wrote:I am curious if the practices I described would be advantageous or give me the best possible chance at success or if 0L practice test taking could even be detrimental somehow. I am aware that many people will do well (and many will not do well) with just getting to maybe and LEEWS as their prep.
Everyone starts on equal footing in law school.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Outlining/Exam Prep As a 0L
What you suggest is detrimental in that it's way more work than it's worth, and you won't really know enough to get any use out of any hypos or practice tests. 0L prep is useless - you'll learn what you need to know once you're in school. But if you really want to do something, sure, Getting to Maybe and LEEWS (Getting to Maybe doesn't make much sense before you know anything about the subjects, but have at it).
The thing is, like BlaqBella said, you won't anything about what your prof wants - you can't really prep for an exam until you know something about it. (Yes, 1L courses cover basically the same subjects; but profs are idiosyncratic. In my 1L year, one Torts prof covered only negligence, and nothing else. My Torts prof also covered intentional torts and some strict liability. So how can you prep for both their exams? You can't.)
The thing is, like BlaqBella said, you won't anything about what your prof wants - you can't really prep for an exam until you know something about it. (Yes, 1L courses cover basically the same subjects; but profs are idiosyncratic. In my 1L year, one Torts prof covered only negligence, and nothing else. My Torts prof also covered intentional torts and some strict liability. So how can you prep for both their exams? You can't.)
Last edited by A. Nony Mouse on Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- lawhopeful10
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:29 pm
Re: Outlining/Exam Prep As a 0L
I had read that once a lot of people develop good law school exam skills they do well regardless of class/professor. However, I am guessing part of "good law school exam skills" is probably being able to recognize what the professor wants lol.BlaqBella wrote:Its been noted that how you do on exams will heavily/entirely depend on what your professor wants on an exam. As you haven't a clue who or what your professor prefers, any outlining/prep you do now will be futile.
- gaud
- Posts: 5765
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 2:58 am
Re: Outlining/Exam Prep As a 0L
That's all there is to it. That's why 0L prep isn't going to be the miracle that everyone hopes.lawhopeful10 wrote: I am guessing part of "good law school exam skills" is probably being able to recognize what the professor wants lol.
- Icculus
- Posts: 1410
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 12:02 am
Re: Outlining/Exam Prep As a 0L
Best way to prep as an 0L:lawhopeful10 wrote:I am curious if the practices I described would be advantageous or give me the best possible chance at success or if 0L practice test taking could even be detrimental somehow. I am aware that many people will do well (and many will not do well) with just getting to maybe and LEEWS as their prep.
1. Chill the fuck out
2. Drink
3. Read Getting to Maybe if you really want to, though the book itself is not exactly rocket science.
4. Enjoy yourself and go into 1L ready to work
If you learn anything you will need to relearn it. As an 0L you will have no idea how to approach a law school exam. For better or worse the socratic method/infinite class hypos will actually help you prep for exams.
- gaud
- Posts: 5765
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 2:58 am
Re: Outlining/Exam Prep As a 0L
Truth.Icculus wrote:Best way to prep as an 0L:lawhopeful10 wrote:I am curious if the practices I described would be advantageous or give me the best possible chance at success or if 0L practice test taking could even be detrimental somehow. I am aware that many people will do well (and many will not do well) with just getting to maybe and LEEWS as their prep.
1. Chill the fuck out
2. Drink
3. Read Getting to Maybe if you really want to, though the book itself is not exactly rocket science.
4. Enjoy yourself and go into 1L ready to work
If you learn anything you will need to relearn it. As an 0L you will have no idea how to approach a law school exam. For better or worse the socratic method/infinite class hypos will actually help you prep for exams.
- thesealocust
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm
Re: Outlining/Exam Prep As a 0L
No, it does not. You cannot prepare substantively for Torts, nor will you ever be tested on Torts. You will be tested on - and only on - the subset of Torts, including just some cases, just some parts of cases, and just some doctrines, taught by Your Torts Professor.
There's little to be said for understanding what one person thinks about Erie since you can only get points on your civ pro exam by applying the Erie doctrine your prof taught - including the emphasis and contours taught by YOUR professor.
Learning the law, broadly and generally, is not hard and does not warrant advanced study. Your grades are not going to depend on your learning Torts the best, they're going to depend on (a) your learning Your Prof's torts well enough, and substantially MORE importantly, (b) on creatively, thoroughly, and effectively applying the Law of Your Prof's Torts to the facts on the exam.
Law exams are not knowledge tests. You'll fail without the knowledge, but gaining it is straightforward. They are skills tests, and "prep" of this sort in advance of law school won't help.
Doing things like skimming Getting to Maybe to put your mind in the right frame of reference for class could be helpful, and learning about the law school timeline/process (through books like Law School Confidential) can be useful.
Obsessing over learning law before law school is just spinning your wheels.
There's little to be said for understanding what one person thinks about Erie since you can only get points on your civ pro exam by applying the Erie doctrine your prof taught - including the emphasis and contours taught by YOUR professor.
Learning the law, broadly and generally, is not hard and does not warrant advanced study. Your grades are not going to depend on your learning Torts the best, they're going to depend on (a) your learning Your Prof's torts well enough, and substantially MORE importantly, (b) on creatively, thoroughly, and effectively applying the Law of Your Prof's Torts to the facts on the exam.
Law exams are not knowledge tests. You'll fail without the knowledge, but gaining it is straightforward. They are skills tests, and "prep" of this sort in advance of law school won't help.
Doing things like skimming Getting to Maybe to put your mind in the right frame of reference for class could be helpful, and learning about the law school timeline/process (through books like Law School Confidential) can be useful.
Obsessing over learning law before law school is just spinning your wheels.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- lawhopeful10
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:29 pm
Re: Outlining/Exam Prep As a 0L
(b) on creatively, thoroughly, and effectively applying the Law of Your Prof's Torts to the facts on the exam.
[/quote]
This was the part I was curious could be worked on and practiced, although it seems most people seem to agree it cannot. I did understand that learning the law the professor would teach is paramount and that learning the law broadly would not help. The only reason it would be done however was to practice point B that you made in the hope being even though learning the law itself would not be beneficial, learning to apply it to a fact pattern would be.
[/quote]
This was the part I was curious could be worked on and practiced, although it seems most people seem to agree it cannot. I did understand that learning the law the professor would teach is paramount and that learning the law broadly would not help. The only reason it would be done however was to practice point B that you made in the hope being even though learning the law itself would not be beneficial, learning to apply it to a fact pattern would be.
- thesealocust
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm
Re: Outlining/Exam Prep As a 0L
This was the part I was curious could be worked on and practiced, although it seems most people seem to agree it cannot. I did understand that learning the law the professor would teach is paramount and that learning the law broadly would not help. The only reason it would be done however was to practice point B that you made in the hope being even though learning the law itself would not be beneficial, learning to apply it to a fact pattern would be.[/quote]lawhopeful10 wrote:(b) on creatively, thoroughly, and effectively applying the Law of Your Prof's Torts to the facts on the exam.
Take that instinct and use it to get into practice exams for material you've covered early in your first semester. You just won't be able to get anything out of this in the abstract.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login