Page 1 of 1
Loss of Chance Doctrine
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:47 pm
by sparty99
If I was mis-diagnosed with cancer and had a 60% chance of living and now it is 20%, but I'm still alive, can I recover damages under the loss of chance doctrine?
Re: Loss of Chance Doctrine
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:56 pm
by cinephile
I don't think so, because nothing the doctor did actually limited your chance of survival, it was just a misdiagnosis (unless diagnosing late limited chance of survival).
Re: Loss of Chance Doctrine
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:09 pm
by thereelshaq
you need to die in order to invoke the loss-of-chance doctrine; courts don’t deal with chances that decrease but are not eliminated.
Re: Loss of Chance Doctrine
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:23 pm
by helloscriptkitti
According to Herskovits v. Group Health, P has to prove that the misdiagnosis caused the decreased probability of survival, based on a "more probable than not" standard. If so, then the reduced chance of survival is actionable. It doesn't specifically say that P has to die, although in this case P happened to die. The evidence that went to the jury was the fact that there was 14% reduction in the chance of survival, not the fact that P died (although I'm sure they considered it).
Re: Loss of Chance Doctrine
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:41 pm
by ilovesf
I just read this in the e&e - if you have it check out page 222 and page 235. It says that theoretically, it should be allowed because the loss of a chance of survival is actually about incurring the risk, not the disease. However, few courts are actually likely to apply loss of a chance of survival if the person is alive. It also brings up the point that if you apply loss of a chance while the person is still alive, if the disease does occur and P dies, a second suit will be barred by res judicata.