Hi all,
Could anyone elaborate on the pros and cons about clerking one year after big law practice? (Federal district or appellate). It’s something I’m interested in, but I’m not totally fond of the idea of moving to a major market for a few months to practice and then going somewhere to clerk.
Clerking One Year After Practice Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 4446
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Clerking One Year After Practice
Probably the biggest pro is that there are some judges who strongly prefer candidates with work experience, so you tend to be a stronger candidate and may have options you wouldn't have had straight out of school. You may also get a little more out of the clerkship by having the practice experience first, because you know a little bit more about how it compares to practice (though I think this is fairly minor). If you want to change firms, it gives you kind of a natural opportunity to do so.
Cons are what you identified - it doesn't have to, but often will involve moving a lot. You'll take a big pay cut for a year, which may be a little tougher psychologically than clerking straight out. Others will have to comment more directly about how it can affect your experience at your firm before/after the clerkship - not sure about that.
Cons are what you identified - it doesn't have to, but often will involve moving a lot. You'll take a big pay cut for a year, which may be a little tougher psychologically than clerking straight out. Others will have to comment more directly about how it can affect your experience at your firm before/after the clerkship - not sure about that.
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Clerking One Year After Practice
I’m clerking now after two years in biglaw. The pros/cons are pretty personal. For me, I knew I wanted to clerk; also, moving, though stressful, presented the opportunity to explore new cities, so I found that appealing.purplegoldtornado wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 12:42 pmHi all,
Could anyone elaborate on the pros and cons about clerking one year after big law practice? (Federal district or appellate). It’s something I’m interested in, but I’m not totally fond of the idea of moving to a major market for a few months to practice and then going somewhere to clerk.
I also realized that I wasn’t interested in my practice area at my biglaw firm, so I saw clerking as a way to transition to a different practice group for my post-clerkship job search.
I’m happy to keep discussing, but I’d be curious to know why you want to clerk/how satisfied you are with your current job, etc.