J. Bumatay Forum

(Seek and share information about clerkship applications, clerkship hiring timelines, and post-clerkship employment opportunities)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Aug 10, 2020 6:35 pm

Anyone have any information about Judge Bumatay on the Ninth? I know he's new, but has already been in the news a lot.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:29 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Aug 10, 2020 6:35 pm
Anyone have any information about Judge Bumatay on the Ninth? I know he's new, but has already been in the news a lot.
He is certainly quite conservative. However, my impression is that his clerks like working for him and that he seems like a nice guy

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 17, 2020 12:28 am

Hard, substantive interviews.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jan 02, 2021 5:13 pm

His clerks seem to really like him/evangelize for him.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jan 02, 2021 9:00 pm

Crossed paths with him when he was an AUSA. He is an entitled individual who felt he could do whatever he wanted because he was politically connected (and he was because he was appointed to that position completely unqualified). I wish him nothing but failure and reversals on his opinions.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Jan 03, 2021 5:42 am

Could you elaborate on why you considered him "entitled"? His resume, for example, is hardly lackluster.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Jan 03, 2021 10:18 am

Hard to give you an definitive answer without outing myself. But the issue involved targeting, and he strongly felt that he should be able to prosecute the case despite having put in no work/equity to develop the investigation. When confronted with this fact he stated he would continue to proceed with the case using evidence he did not derive.

I have dealt with many prosecutors within DOJ, but there are only a handful as callous at Patrick was.
Not to mention his voice is very irritating.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Jan 03, 2021 1:08 pm

.

(it isn't worth it)

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Jan 04, 2021 7:07 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Jan 03, 2021 1:08 pm
.

(it isn't worth it)
is clerking for him that bad? i was considering applying

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
InvisiblePineapple

New
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2017 10:18 pm

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by InvisiblePineapple » Mon Jan 04, 2021 7:17 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Jan 03, 2021 10:18 am
Not to mention his voice is very irritating.
Not necessarily defending the guy because I know nothing about him but this feels homophobic.

replevin123

New
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2019 2:50 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by replevin123 » Mon Jan 04, 2021 8:35 pm

InvisiblePineapple wrote:
Mon Jan 04, 2021 7:17 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Jan 03, 2021 10:18 am
Not to mention his voice is very irritating.
Not necessarily defending the guy because I know nothing about him but this feels homophobic.
also know nothing about him and know nothing about the anon poster who edited (removed) his post. But could potentially see the slight benefit of the doubt on this sole point as many Filipinos and first-gen Filipino Americans could be considered (by some) to have strong accents compared with more typical US English, e.g. stresses on different syllables. Totally different, but kind of a similar effect might be observed in English spoken by Indians/first-gen Indian households. Some people might find that hard to listen to, in which case I would argue they need to work on themselves rather than criticize others' voices as irritating. If anything it should be celebrated. We're still a melting pot last time I checked.

Regardless, this voice-point is a certainly a personal attack and was inappropriate.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 08, 2021 3:46 pm

.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Fri Jan 08, 2021 3:49 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 08, 2021 3:46 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Mon Jan 04, 2021 7:07 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Jan 03, 2021 1:08 pm
.

(it isn't worth it)
is clerking for him that bad? i was considering applying
I think the poster originally had a more full-throated attack and deleted because "it isn't worth it." I have heard nothing but wonderful things from his clerks, FWIW.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:14 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Jan 08, 2021 3:46 pm
I think the poster originally had a more full-throated attack and deleted because "it isn't worth it." I have heard nothing but wonderful things from his clerks, FWIW.
That was me. It wasn't a full-throated attack, but a repetition of not-great scuttlebutt about his path to the bench. I regretted it and deleted it. I should've been clearer that I wasn't commenting on the worth-it ness of clerking for him but instead the worth-it ness of how he got there.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:49 pm

One of the posts, since deleted, said he purposefully sought out the most cruel policies to work on for career advancement purposes in the Trump admin. (I think that’s sufficiently vague that it’s not outing anyone but that’s the gist).

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Jan 04, 2022 12:23 pm

Does anyone have intel about his work/life balance? Is he a Kozinski work-you-to-death, and so on?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Jan 04, 2022 12:32 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Tue Jan 04, 2022 12:23 pm
Does anyone have intel about his work/life balance? Is he a Kozinski work-you-to-death, and so on?
I don't have any sources inside chambers, but all active CA9 judges are busy, and Bumatay is very active in the en banc process which can add to the workload as well.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Jan 04, 2022 12:34 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Tue Jan 04, 2022 12:32 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Tue Jan 04, 2022 12:23 pm
Does anyone have intel about his work/life balance? Is he a Kozinski work-you-to-death, and so on?
I don't have any sources inside chambers, but all active CA9 judges are busy, and Bumatay is very active in the en banc process which can add to the workload as well.
Yes, of course. I was asking if he is unusually demanding for a 9th Circuit judge a la Kozinski.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Jan 04, 2022 3:34 pm

Very nice guy. But he hires almost exclusively from right-wing circles. In my experience, the clerks he hires also lack the academic credentials most judges on CA9 would require. Draw your own conclusions.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 07, 2022 3:13 pm

Clerked for another SD-based COA judge, so had plenty of run ins with Bumatay's chambers.

Bumatay seems like a nice person and friendly. His clerks also seem well-adjusted and did not complain about being overly worked or stressed. I have heard that the interview is pretty intense, but I did not get the impression that the chambers was like that.

Bumatay is definitely very conservative, and he is also quite active in the en banc process, which could mean more work for the clerks.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jan 07, 2022 6:18 pm

You get to do a clerk reunion with Tymkovich and Gorsuch in Colorado which is cool

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jan 08, 2022 9:42 pm

Tymkovich makes sense b/c Bumatay clerked for him, but why Gorsuch?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jan 08, 2022 10:54 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Jan 08, 2022 9:42 pm
Tymkovich makes sense b/c Bumatay clerked for him, but why Gorsuch?
Complete guess, but probably a holdover from Gorsuch being on the Tenth—i.e., they may have done the reunion together.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:11 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Jan 08, 2022 10:54 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Sat Jan 08, 2022 9:42 pm
Tymkovich makes sense b/c Bumatay clerked for him, but why Gorsuch?
Complete guess, but probably a holdover from Gorsuch being on the Tenth—i.e., they may have done the reunion together.
Also, Bumatay was apparently lent out by DOJ to aid in Gorsuch's nomination.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428484
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: J. Bumatay

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:11 pm

Bumatay also co-taught a seminar with Gorsuch in Iceland this summer

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Judicial Clerkships”