Thank you notes
Posted: Wed May 10, 2017 4:01 pm
Should thank you notes be sent to chambers after an interview? Is there a consensus on this?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=277584
+1. My judge is a little bit old-school and he specifically mentioned my thank you note when chatting for a few minutes after he offered. Keep them short and genuine, but I think it could potentially make a difference (even if it's tiny).Anonymous User wrote:I'm a current d.ct. clerk involved in interviewing candidates.
I don't care if you send me a thank you note after our interview, but my co-clerk does. Since you have no way of knowing which clerks will care, and because it involves so little effort on your part, you might as well send individual thank you notes to everyone (clerks and judge, hell, maybe even the JA if she was nice and chatted with you before your interview). The time and postage you save is not worth potentially pissing off somebody with a lot of power over your application (even if its rather unreasonable reason to be pissed off).
Does your judge not de-brief with you and your co-clerks immediately after the candidate leaves chambers?Anonymous User wrote:I'm a current d.ct. clerk involved in interviewing candidates.
I don't care if you send me a thank you note after our interview, but my co-clerk does. Since you have no way of knowing which clerks will care, and because it involves so little effort on your part, you might as well send individual thank you notes to everyone (clerks and judge, hell, maybe even the JA if she was nice and chatted with you before your interview). The time and postage you save is not worth potentially pissing off somebody with a lot of power over your application (even if its rather unreasonable reason to be pissed off).
Sure, no one should care about the cost of time and postage. But that's not the only potential cost here. The downside of thank-you notes is that they hurt you if executed poorly. So, if you're going to send a thank-you note, make damn sure that every word is spelled correctly. And be careful with the "personalize every thank-you note" advice. Highly personalized thank-you notes can be pretty weird.Anonymous User wrote: The time and postage you save is not worth potentially pissing off somebody with a lot of power over your application (even if its rather unreasonable reason to be pissed off).
He does, but a decision isn't always made immediately during that debriefing. Often we wait until we interview several candidates and then compare them. I can see some clerks (not me) counting a lack of a thank-you note against you in a later hiring discussion with the judge.cheaptilts wrote: Does your judge not de-brief with you and your co-clerks immediately after the candidate leaves chambers?
I know this isn't you, but what a batshit reason to reject someone.Anonymous User wrote:He does, but a decision isn't always made immediately during that debriefing. Often we wait until we interview several candidates and then compare them. I can see some clerks (not me) counting a lack of a thank-you note against you in a later hiring discussion with the judge.cheaptilts wrote: Does your judge not de-brief with you and your co-clerks immediately after the candidate leaves chambers?
Same anon as above. I totally get this concern, as I have received some borderline creepy thank-you notes. From talking with my co-clerk (and another current clerk I know in a different chambers who also cares about thank you notes), my sense is that these people view it in a binary fashion. In other words, they care that you took the time to send a note, not so much about its contents.mjb447 wrote:I generally don't send them - there's a sweet spot that I'm never quite able to achieve between totally generic and overly familiar, and I think sending one that's too far in either direction can be worse than not sending anything at all.